JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Interpretive Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, D.
J. Dairy Sci. 87:1208-1216
© American Dairy Science Association, 2004.

Free-Stall Dimensions: Effects on Preference and Stall Usage

C. B. Tucker, D. M. Weary and D. Fraser

Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada V6N 1Z4

Corresponding author: C. Tucker; e-mail: cassandra.tucker{at}agresearch.co.nz.

In 2 experiments, free-stall dimensions were examined to determine how they affected stall preference, usage, cleanliness, and milk production in Holstein dairy cattle. In experiment 1, stall width (112 or 132 cm) and stall length (229 and 274 cm from curb to wall) were compared in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of stall treatments using 15 individually housed, non-lactating animals. Cows showed no clear preference for stall size as measured by lying time. When animals had no choice between stalls, average lying time was higher in the wide stalls than in the narrow stalls (10.8 vs. 9.6 ± 0.3 h/24 h). Both length and width affected time spent standing with only the front hooves in the stall; total stall area is best explained by the variation associated with this behavior. In experiment 2, 27 lactating dairy cattle were alternately housed with access to stalls of 106, 116, or 126 cm in width using a cross-over design with exposure to each treatment lasting 3 wk. Animals spent an additional 42 min/24 h lying in stalls measuring 126 cm in width compared with stalls with only 106 cm between partitions. Free-stall width influenced the time spent standing with the front 2 hooves in the stall; animals averaged 58 min/24 h in the widest stalls and 85 min/24 h in the narrowest stalls. The amount of time spent standing with all 4 hooves in the stall tended to be longer in wider stalls, and these stalls were also most likely to become soiled with feces. Stall width did not affect the number of lying events or milk production. In conclusion, animals spent more time lying down, and less time was spent standing with only the front hooves in larger stalls, but larger stalls were also more likely to become soiled.

Key Words: dairy cattle • behavior • free-stall • housing




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
F. Bernardi, J. Fregonesi, C. Winckler, D. M. Veira, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and D. M. Weary
The stall-design paradox: Neck rails increase lameness but improve udder and stall hygiene
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2009; 92(7): 3074 - 3080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. B. Tucker, D. M. Weary, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and K. A. Beauchemin
Cow comfort in tie-stalls: Increased depth of shavings or straw bedding increases lying time
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2009; 92(6): 2684 - 2690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. A. Fregonesi, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, C. B. Tucker, D. M. Veira, and D. M. Weary
Neck-rail position in the free stall affects standing behavior and udder and stall cleanliness
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2009; 92(5): 1979 - 1985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. E. Fernandez, R. A. Marino, and X. C. Carreira
Algorithms for dairy barn design: Maternity and milking areas
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2009; 92(5): 2276 - 2296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
N. B. Cook, M. J. Marin, R. L. Mentink, T. B. Bennett, and M. J. Schaefer
Comfort Zone-Design Free Stalls: Do They Influence the Stall Use Behavior of Lame Cows?
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2008; 91(12): 4673 - 4678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. A. Fregonesi, D. M. Veira, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and D. M. Weary
Effects of Bedding Quality on Lying Behavior of Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5468 - 5472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. A. Fregonesi, C. B. Tucker, and D. M. Weary
Overstocking Reduces Lying Time in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3349 - 3354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
W. K. Fulwider, T. Grandin, D. J. Garrick, T. E. Engle, W. D. Lamm, N. L. Dalsted, and B. E. Rollin
Influence of Free-Stall Base on Tarsal Joint Lesions and Hygiene in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3559 - 3566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. De Palo, A. Tateo, F. Zezza, M. Corrente, and P. Centoducati
Influence of Free-Stall Flooring on Comfort and Hygiene of Dairy Cows During Warm Climatic Conditions
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4583 - 4595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. Z. Caraviello, K. A. Weigel, P. M. Fricke, M. C. Wiltbank, M. J. Florent, N. B. Cook, K. V. Nordlund, N. R. Zwald, and C. L. Rawson
Survey of Management Practices on Reproductive Performance of Dairy Cattle on Large US Commercial Farms
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4723 - 4735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. B. Tucker, G. Zdanowicz, and D. M. Weary
Brisket boards reduce freestall use.
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2603 - 2607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. E. Fernandez, R. A. Marino, and X. C. Carreira
Algorithms for dairy barn design: resting, feeding, and exercise.
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2784 - 2798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
N. B. Cook, T. B. Bennett, and K. V. Nordlund
Monitoring Indices of Cow Comfort in Free-Stall-Housed Dairy Herds
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 3876 - 3885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. B. Tucker, D. M. Weary, and D. Fraser
Influence of Neck-Rail Placement on Free-Stall Preference, Use, and Cleanliness
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2005; 88(8): 2730 - 2737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Drissler, M. Gaworski, C. B. Tucker, and D. M. Weary
Freestall Maintenance: Effects on Lying Behavior of Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2005; 88(7): 2381 - 2387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. B. Tucker and D. M. Weary
Bedding on Geotextile Mattresses: How Much is Needed to Improve Cow Comfort?
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2004; 87(9): 2889 - 2895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Ceballos, D. Sanderson, J. Rushen, and D. M. Weary
Improving Stall Design: Use of 3-D Kinematics to Measure Space Use by Dairy Cows when Lying Down
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(7): 2042 - 2050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.