|
|
||||||||
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Corresponding author: T. R. Overton; e-mail: tro2{at}cornell.edu.
Multiparous Holstein cows (n = 337) on two commercial dairy farms were used to determine the effects of feeding a close-up diet for 21 (treatment S) or 60 d (treatment L). Milk yield was not affected by treatment; however, cows fed treatment S tended to have increased yields of fat, 3.5% fat-corrected milk, and protein during the first 5 mo of their subsequent lactation compared to treatment L. Cows fed treatment L gained more body condition score (BCS) during the dry period and had longer days to first service. As a secondary objective, relationships of BCS at dry off and subsequent performance were evaluated. Cows with initial BCS
3.0 (thinner) tended to produce more milk during early lactation than cows with initial BCS
3.25 (fatter). A trend for an interaction of treatment and initial BCS existed for milk yield such that thinner cows fed treatment S produced the most milk and fatter cows fed treatment S produced the least amount of milk; cows fed treatment L regardless of BCS produced an intermediate amount of milk. Subsequent reproductive performance was similar among thinner and fatter cows. These data indicate that 2 group nutritional strategies for dry cows are preferred, and BCS at dry off should be considered when determining grouping and nutritional strategies for dry cows. Furthermore, moderately thin cows at dry off do not have impaired performance during their subsequent lactation compared to cows of greater BCS.
Key Words: periparturient cow grouping body condition score
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Bewley and M. M. Schutz Review: An Interdisciplinary Review of Body Condition Scoring for Dairy Cattle Professional Animal Scientist, December 1, 2008; 24(6): 507 - 529. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Winkelman, T. H. Elsasser, and C. K. Reynolds Limit-Feeding a High-Energy Diet to Meet Energy Requirements in the Dry Period Alters Plasma Metabolite Concentrations but Does Not Affect Intake or Milk Production in Early Lactation J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2008; 91(3): 1067 - 1079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Huzzey, D. M. Veira, D. M. Weary, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk Prepartum Behavior and Dry Matter Intake Identify Dairy Cows at Risk for Metritis J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3220 - 3233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Z. Caraviello, K. A. Weigel, P. M. Fricke, M. C. Wiltbank, M. J. Florent, N. B. Cook, K. V. Nordlund, N. R. Zwald, and C. L. Rawson Survey of Management Practices on Reproductive Performance of Dairy Cattle on Large US Commercial Farms J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4723 - 4735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Kononoff, S. K. Ivan, W. Matzke, R. J. Grant, R. A. Stock, and T. J. Klopfenstein Milk production of dairy cows fed wet corn gluten feed during the dry period and lactation. J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2608 - 2617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Overton and M. R. Waldron Nutritional Management of Transition Dairy Cows: Strategies to Optimize Metabolic Health J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(13_suppl): E105 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |