| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
2 ANAFI, Cremona, Italy
Corresponding author: M. M. Schutz, e-mail: mschutz{at}purdue.edu.
Continual selection for increased milk yield for more than 40 yr, combined with the antagonistic relationship between increasing yield, somatic cell count, and fertility, have resulted in sires that may not be optimal for producing daughters for grazing systems where seasonal calving is very important. The objective of this study was to investigate the possible existence of a genotype x environment interaction (G x E) in grazing vs. confinement herds within the United States for lactation average somatic cell score (LSCS), days open (DO), days to first service (DFS), and number of services per conception (SPC). Grazing herds were defined as those that utilized grazing for at least 6 mo each year and were enrolled in Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI). Control herds were confinement DHI herds of similar size in the same states. For LSCS, the performance of daughters in grazing and control herds was examined using linear regression of LSCS on the November 2000 USDA-DHIA sire predicted transmitting abilities (PTA) for SCS. Genetic parameters for all traits were estimated using REML in a bivariate animal model that treated the same trait in different environments as different traits. Rank correlations were calculated between sires’ estimated breeding values for LSCS, calculated separately for sires in both environments. The coefficient of regression of daughter LSCS on sire PTA was less in grazing herds than in control herds. The coefficient of regression for control herds was closer to expectation. Estimates of heritability were approximately 0.12 for LSCS, and less than 0.05 for the reproduction traits. Heritabilities for DO, DFS, and SPC were slightly higher for control herds. Estimates of genetic correlation for each reproductive trait between the 2 environments were high and not significantly different from unity. Generally, these traits appear to be under similar genetic control, but a lower coefficient of regression of LSCS on sire PTA for SCS in grazing herds suggests differences in daughter performance in grazing herds may be overstated based on current PTA for SCS.
Key Words: genotype x environment interaction • grazing • health • reproduction
Abbreviation key: DO = days open, DFS = days to first service, G x E = genotype x environment interaction, LSCS = lactation average somatic cell score, SPC = services per conception
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. Strandberg, S. Brotherstone, E. Wall, and M. P. Coffey Genotype by environment interaction for first-lactation female fertility traits in UK dairy cattle J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2009; 92(7): 3437 - 3446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Haile-Mariam, M. J. Carrick, and M. E. Goddard Genotype by Environment Interaction for Fertility, Survival, and Milk Production Traits in Australian Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2008; 91(12): 4840 - 4853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Walsh, F. Buckley, D. P. Berry, M. Rath, K. Pierce, N. Byrne, and P. Dillon Effects of Breed, Feeding System, and Parity on Udder Health and Milking Characteristics J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5767 - 5779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. G. Fahey, M. M. Schutz, D. L. Lofgren, A. P. Schinckel, and T. S. Stewart Genotype by Environment Interaction for Production Traits While Accounting for Heteroscedasticity J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3889 - 3899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F. Kearney, M. M. Schutz, P. J. Boettcher, and K. A. Weigel Genotype x Environment Interaction for Grazing Versus Confinement. I. Production Traits J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2004; 87(2): 501 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
