| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
2 ANAFI, Cremona, Italy
3 Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706
Corresponding Author: M. M.. Schutz; e-mail: mschutz{at}purdue.edu.
The objective of this study was to investigate the possible existence of a genotype x environment interaction (GxE) for production traits of US Holsteins in grazing versus confinement herds. Grazing herds were defined as those that utilized grazing for at least 6 mo and were enrolled in dairy herd improvement (DHI). Control herds were confinement DHI herds of comparable size in similar regions. The performance of daughters in grazing herds and control herds was examined using linear regression of mature equivalent milk, fat, and protein yield on the November 2000 USDA-DHI predicted transmitting abilities (PTA) of their sires for those traits. Heritabilities and genetic correlations were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood in a bivariate animal model that considered the same trait in different environments as different traits. Product-moment and rank correlations were calculated between sires’ estimated breeding values, estimated separately in both environments. For grazing herds, the coefficient of regression of milk, fat and protein on PTA were 0.78, 0.76, and 0.78, respectively. Corresponding coefficients in the control herds were 0.99, 0.96, and 0.98. Estimates of heritability for the traits ranged from 0.2 to 0.25, and differences between grazing and control environments were small. Estimates of the genetic correlations for the traits in both environments were 0.89, 0.88, and 0.91 for milk, fat, and protein, respectively. Within-quartile analyses revealed a lower correlation for milk and protein between the upper and lower grazing quartiles, while the same quartiles for the control herds did not differ from unity. Rank correlation coefficients between sire estimated breeding values from the 2 environments were 0.59, 0.63, and 0.66 for milk, fat, and protein, respectively. The mean rank change for the top 100 sires between the two environments was 27. The regression coefficients indicate that expected daughter differences may be overstated by current sire PTA in grazing herds. Genetic correlations less than unity suggests that there is, at least, some reranking among sires in both environments, while the rank correlations indicate the possibility of sire reranking when evaluations were performed within management system. However, differences are not so large as to justify separate genetic evaluations for each system.
Key Words: grazing • production • genotype x environment interaction
Abbreviation key: GxE = genotype x environment interaction, MEM = mature equivalent milk, MEF = mature equivalent fat, MEP = mature equivalent protein
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Hammami, B. Rekik, C. Bastin, H. Soyeurt, J. Bormann, J. Stoll, and N. Gengler Environmental sensitivity for milk yield in Luxembourg and Tunisian Holsteins by herd management level J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2009; 92(9): 4604 - 4612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Haile-Mariam, M. J. Carrick, and M. E. Goddard Genotype by Environment Interaction for Fertility, Survival, and Milk Production Traits in Australian Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2008; 91(12): 4840 - 4853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Heins, L. B. Hansen, A. J. Seykora, D. G. Johnson, J. G. Linn, J. E. Romano, and A. R. Hazel Crossbreds of Jersey x Holstein Compared with Pure Holsteins for Production, Fertility, and Body and Udder Measurements During First Lactation J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2008; 91(3): 1270 - 1278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Haskell, S. Brotherstone, A. B. Lawrence, and I. M. S. White Characterization of the Dairy Farm Environment in Great Britain and the Effect of the Farm Environment on Cow Life Span J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5316 - 5323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. G. Fahey, M. M. Schutz, D. L. Lofgren, A. P. Schinckel, and T. S. Stewart Genotype by Environment Interaction for Production Traits While Accounting for Heteroscedasticity J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3889 - 3899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Bryant, N. Lopez-Villalobos, J. E. Pryce, C. W. Holmes, D. L. Johnson, and D. J. Garrick Environmental Sensitivity in New Zealand Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1538 - 1547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Rozzi, F. Miglior, and K. J. Hand A Total Merit Selection Index for Ontario Organic Dairy Farmers J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1584 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. D. Dechow and H. D. Norman Within-Herd Heritability Estimated with Daughter-Parent Regression for Yield and Somatic Cell Score J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 482 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. A. Mulder and P. Bijma Benefits of Cooperation Between Breeding Programs in the Presence of Genotype by Environment Interaction J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1727 - 1739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. A. Mulder, R. F. Veerkamp, B. J. Ducro, J. A. M. van Arendonk, and P. Bijma Optimization of Dairy Cattle Breeding Programs for Different Environments with Genotype by Environment Interaction J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1740 - 1752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F. Kearney, M. M. Schutz, and P. J. Boettcher Genotype x Environment Interaction for Grazing vs. Confinement. II. Health and Reproduction Traits J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2004; 87(2): 510 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
