JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weigel, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weigel, K. A.
J. Dairy Sci. 87:E86-E92
© American Dairy Science Association, 2004.

Improving the Reproductive Efficiency of Dairy Cattle through Genetic Selection*

K. A. Weigel

Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

Achieving pregnancy in high-producing dairy cows in a timely and cost-effective manner is one of today’s greatest management challenges. Fertility is highly influenced by management and environmental factors, but significant genetic differences exist in both male (service sire) and female (daughter) fertility. The first challenge in improving fertility through genetic selection is data collection, because an inverse relationship exists between quantity and quality. Rough measures, such as calving interval, are available for all multiparous milk-recorded cows. Insemination data (and, hence, nonreturn rates) are available for perhaps half of the population, while pregnancy examination data are available for roughly a quarter of the population. Detailed data regarding technician, type of breeding (standing or synchronized), and so on are available from selected herds, but milk progesterone data are limited to experimental studies. Statistical modeling is also a challenge, because linear models are inappropriate for binary traits, and data for continuous traits are badly skewed and frequently censored. Threshold models can be used for binary data, but survival (failure time) models may more effectively fit the complex nature of fertility traits and the genetic and environmental factors that influence them. This paper describes 2 potential approaches to genetic analysis of fertility traits based on detailed reproductive data and advanced statistical methodology. The first is a large-scale threshold model analysis that uses data regarding veterinarian-confirmed conception rates, while the second is an in-depth analysis of the management and genetic factors that influence fertility in a failure time model that properly accounts for censoring among cows that were culled or failed to conceive. The former approach can be used for large-scale analyses of service sire fertility, while the latter can be used for evaluation of reproductive management, as well as genetic improvement of daughter fertility.

Key Words: reproduction • fertility • genetic selection • dairy cattle

Abbreviation key: CI = calving interval, CR = conception rate, DFS = days to first service, DO = days open, DPPX = days until a positive pregnancy examination, DPR = daughter pregnancy rate, ERCR = estimated relative conception rate, NRR = nonreturn rate, SPC = services per conception, VCCR = veterinarian-confirmed conception rate




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman
Modeling Nuisance Variables for Prediction of Service Sire Fertility
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2008; 91(7): 2823 - 2835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. T. Kuhn and J. L. Hutchison
Prediction of Dairy Bull Fertility from Field Data: Use of Multiple Services and Identification and Utilization of Factors Affecting Bull Fertility
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2008; 91(6): 2481 - 2492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. Melendez and P. Pinedo
The Association Between Reproductive Performance and Milk Yield in Chilean Holstein Cattle
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 184 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. Z. Caraviello, K. A. Weigel, M. Craven, D. Gianola, N. B. Cook, K. V. Nordlund, P. M. Fricke, and M. C. Wiltbank
Analysis of Reproductive Performance of Lactating Cows on Large Dairy Farms Using Machine Learning Algorithms
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4703 - 4722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and G. R. Wiggans
Characterization of Holstein Heifer Fertility in the United States
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4907 - 4920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
Y. M. Chang, I. M. Andersen-Ranberg, B. Heringstad, D. Gianola, and G. Klemetsdal
Bivariate Analysis of Number of Services to Conception and Days Open in Norwegian Red Using a Censored Threshold-Linear Model
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2006; 89(2): 772 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Jamrozik, J. Fatehi, G. J. Kistemaker, and L. R. Schaeffer
Estimates of Genetic Parameters for Canadian Holstein Female Reproduction Traits
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2005; 88(6): 2199 - 2208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.