|
|
||||||||

MN-SD Dairy Foods Research Center, Dairy Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007
Corresponding author: V. V. Mistry; e-mail: vikram.mistry{at}sdstate.edu.
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of vacuum-condensed (CM) and ultrafiltered (UF) milk on some compositional and functional properties of Cheddar cheese. Five treatments were designed to have 2 levels of concentration (4.5 and 6.0% protein) from vacuum-condensed milk (CM1 and CM2) and ultrafiltered milk (UF1 and UF2) along with a 3.2% protein control. The samples were analyzed for fat, protein, ash, calcium, and salt contents at 1 wk. Moisture content, soluble protein, meltability, sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE, and counts of lactic acid bacteria and nonstarter lactic acid bacteria were performed on samples at 1, 18, and 30 wk. At 1 wk, the moisture content ranged from 39.2 (control) to 36.5% (UF2). Fat content ranged from 31.5 to 32.4% with no significant differences among treatments, and salt content ranged from 1.38 to 1.83% with significant differences. Calcium content was higher in UF cheeses than in CM cheeses followed by control, and it increased with protein content in cheese milk. Ultrafiltered milk produced cheese with higher protein content than CM milk. The soluble protein content of all cheeses increased during 30 wk of ripening. Condensed milk cheeses exhibited a higher level of proteolysis than UF cheeses. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-PAGE showed retarded proteolysis with increase in level of concentration. The breakdown of
s1- casein and
s1-I-casein fractions was highest in the control and decreased with increase in protein content of cheese milk, with UF2 being the lowest. There was no significant degradation of ß-casein. Overall increase in proteolytic products was the highest in control, and it decreased with increase in protein content of cheese milk. No significant differences in the counts of lactic starters or nonstarter lactic acid bacteria were observed. Extent as well as method of concentration influenced the melting characteristics of the cheeses. Melting was greatest in the control cheeses and least in cheese made from condensed milk and decreased with increasing level of milk protein concentration. Vacuum condensing and ultrafiltration resulted in Cheddar cheeses of distinctly different quality. Although both methods have their advantages and disadvantages, the selection of the right method would depend upon the objective of the manufacturer and intended use of the cheese.
Key Words: ultrafiltration condensing Cheddar cheese
Abbreviation key: CM = condensed milk, CM1 = condensed milk cheese with 4.5% protein, CM2 = condensed milk cheese with 6.0% protein, LAB = lactic acid bacteria, NSLAB = nonstarter lactic acid bacteria, UF1 = ultrafiltered milk cheese with 4.5% protein, UF2 = ultrafiltered milk cheese with 6.0% protein.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Agrawal and A. N. Hassan Ultrafiltered Milk Reduces Bitterness in Reduced-Fat Cheddar Cheese Made with an Exopolysaccharide-Producing Culture J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3110 - 3117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kapoor, L. E. Metzger, A. C. Biswas, and K. Muthukummarappan Effect of Natural Cheese Characteristics on Process Cheese Properties J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2007; 90(4): 1625 - 1634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Upreti and L. E. Metzger Influence of Calcium and Phosphorus, Lactose, and Salt-to-Moisture Ratio on Cheddar Cheese Quality: pH Changes During Ripening J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 1 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Upreti and L. E. Metzger Influence of Calcium and Phosphorus, Lactose, and Salt-to-Moisture Ratio on Cheddar Cheese Quality: Manufacture and Composition J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2006; 89(2): 420 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Acharya and V. V. Mistry Effect of Vacuum-Condensed or Ultrafiltered Milk on Pasteurized Process Cheese J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2005; 88(9): 3037 - 3043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |