JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miron, J.
Right arrow Articles by Maltz, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miron, J.
Right arrow Articles by Maltz, E.
J. Dairy Sci. 87:3808-3815
© American Dairy Science Association, 2004.

Lactation Performance and Feeding Behavior of Dairy Cows Supplemented Via Automatic Feeders with Soy Hulls or Barley Based Pellets

J. Miron1, M. Nikbachat1, A. Zenou1, D. Ben-Ghedalia1, R. Solomon2, E. Shoshani2, I. Halachmi3, N. Livshin3, A. Antler3 and E. Maltz3

1 Institute of Animal Science, Department of Dairy Science, ARO, Bet Dagan, Israel
2 Israeli Ministry of Agriculture, Extension Service, Bet Dagan, Israel
3 Institute of Agricultural Engineering, ARO, Bet Dagan, Israel

Corresponding author: J. Miron; e-mail: jmiron{at}volcani.agri.gov.il.

The potential of soy hulls to replace barley grain in pellets supplemented to lactating cows was measured in automatic concentrate feeders (ACF). Thirty-six cows were divided into 2 equal groups and fed 1 of the 2 experimental pellet supplements individually for 7 wk. All cows were group-fed a basic mixture along the feeding lane (~64% of dietary DM) plus a pelleted additive containing 50% barley or soy hulls as barley replacer, fed individually to each cow via the ACF in 6 feeding windows. Extent and rate of in vitro DM digestibility were similar for both types of pellets; however, NDF content and digestibility were higher in the soy hulls pellets. Average number of rewarded cow visits at the ACF, pellets intake per meal, and accumulated intake of pellets (8.64 kg/d DM) were similar in the 2 experimental groups. Most pellets were consumed during day and night in the first 2 h after feeding windows were opened. Total visits per day in the ACF and the maximal interval between visits were similar for the 2 pellets, indicating similar attractiveness to the cow. Predicted intake of the basic mixture was similar in both groups (14.8 to 15.1 kg of DM/d). Higher milk fat content was observed in the soy hulls-fed cows, whereas higher milk protein content was found in the barley-fed cows. Milk yield was similar in both groups. Data suggest that replacement of barley pellets with soy hulls pellets may slightly enhance milk fat while reducing milk protein production for dairy herds using automatic milking systems.

Key Words: pelleted soy hulls • barley pellets • automatic concentrate feeder • milk production

Abbreviation key: ACF = automatic concentrate feeder, AMS = automatic milking system, BG = barley grains, ECM = economically-corrected milk, FW = feeding windows, SH = soy hulls.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
I. Halachmi, E. Shoshani, R. Solomon, E. Maltz, and J. Miron
Feeding of pellets rich in digestible neutral detergent fiber to lactating cows in an automatic milking system.
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2006; 89(8): 3241 - 3249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.