|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Animal Science, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721
2 Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Idaho, Moscow 83844
3 Animal Agriculture Business, Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO 63198
Corresponding author: R. J. Collier; e-mail: rcollier{at}ag.arizona.edu.
Dry periods of 40 to 60 d have been an industry standard because dry periods <40 d have resulted in reduced milk yields in the subsequent lactation by 10 to 30%. However, recent research has demonstrated no production losses for cows given a 30-d dry period. The current study evaluated milk production effects of shortened or omitted dry periods for cows at mature-equivalent production >12,000 kg of milk and treated with bovine somatotropin (bST). The study used 2 commercial dairies and one university dairy and included 4 treatments. Five multiparous and 5 primiparous cows from each farm were assigned to each treatment: 1) 60-d dry period, label use of bST (60DD); 2) 30-d dry period, label use of bST (30DD); 3) continuous milking, label use of bST (CMLST); and 4) continuous milking with continuous use of bST (CMCST). Per label, bST use started at 57 to 70 d in milk and ended 14 d before drying (60DD and 30DD) or expected calving date (CMLST). In primiparous cows, average milk yields during the first 17 wk of lactation were reduced for cows on treatments 30DD, CMLST, and CMCST vs. the 60DD treatment. (38.3, 35.1, and 37.5 vs. 44.1 ± 1.3 kg/d, respectively). For multiparous cows, respective milk yields did not differ (46.6, 43.4, 46.5, and 47.7 ± 2.1 kg/d). Shortened or omitted dry periods may impede mammary growth in primiparous cows, resulting in reduced milk yield in the subsequent lactation. In contrast, a shortened or omitted dry period with either bST protocol did not alter production in multiparous cows treated with bST. Quality aspects of prepartum milk and colostrum require additional characterization. For multiparous cows, milk income generated for short dry periods or for continuous milking might increase their profitability. At 17 wk of the subsequent lactation, estimates of the cumulative net margins of multiparous cows on the 30DD treatment and continuous milking treatments exceeded those of cows on the 60DD treatment by $40 to $60 per cow.
Key Words: continuous lactation shortened dry period bovine somatotropin
Abbreviation key: 30DD = 30-d dry period, label use of bST, 60DD = 60-d dry period, label use of bST, CM = continuous milking, CMCST = no dry period, continuous use of bST, CMLST = no dry period, label use of bST, CNM = cumulative net margin, MEC = mammary epithelial cell, RIA = radioimmunoassay, WRC = week relative to calving
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. D. Watters, J. N. Guenther, A. E. Brickner, R. R. Rastani, P. M. Crump, P. W. Clark, and R. R. Grummer Effects of Dry Period Length on Milk Production and Health of Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2008; 91(7): 2595 - 2603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Madsen, M. O. Nielsen, J. B. Andersen, and K. L. Ingvartsen Continuous Lactation in Dairy Cows: Effect on Milk Production and Mammary Nutrient Supply and Extraction J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 1791 - 1801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Annen, C. M. Stiening, B. A. Crooker, A. C. Fitzgerald, and R. J. Collier Effect of continuous milking and prostaglandin E2 on milk production and mammary epithelial cell turnover, ultrastructure, and gene expression J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1132 - 1144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Fitzgerald, E. L. Annen-Dawson, L. H. Baumgard, and R. J. Collier Evaluation of Continuous Lactation and Increased Milking Frequency on Milk Production and Mammary Cell Turnover in Primiparous Holstein Cows J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5483 - 5489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pezeshki, J. Mehrzad, G. R. Ghorbani, H. R. Rahmani, R. J. Collier, and C. Burvenich Effects of Short Dry Periods on Performance and Metabolic Status in Holstein Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5531 - 5541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Rastani, N. S. Del Rio, T. F. Gressley, G. E. Dahl, and R. R. Grummer Effects of Increasing Milking Frequency During the Last 28 Days of Gestation on Milk Production, Dry Matter Intake, and Energy Balance in Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2007; 90(4): 1729 - 1739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Dry Period Length in US Jerseys: Characterization and Effects on Performance J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2007; 90(4): 2069 - 2081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Annen, A. C. Fitzgerald, P. C. Gentry, M. A. McGuire, A. V. Capuco, L. H. Baumgard, and R. J. Collier Effect of Continuous Milking and Bovine Somatotropin Supplementation on Mammary Epithelial Cell Turnover J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 165 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Caja, A. A. K. Salama, and X. Such Omitting the dry-off period negatively affects colostrum and milk yield in dairy goats. J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2006; 89(11): 4220 - 4228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Dry Period Length to Maximize Production Across Adjacent Lactations and Lifetime Production J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1713 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Gulay, M. J. Hayen, H. H. Head, C. J. Wilcox, and K. C. Bachman Milk Production from Holstein Half Udders After Concurrent Thirty- and Seventy-Day Dry Periods J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 3953 - 3962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Andersen, T. G. Madsen, T. Larsen, K. L. Ingvartsen, and M. O. Nielsen The Effects of Dry Period Versus Continuous Lactation on Metabolic Status and Performance in Periparturient Cows J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2005; 88(10): 3530 - 3541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gumen, R. R. Rastani, R. R. Grummer, and M. C. Wiltbank Reduced Dry Periods and Varying Prepartum Diets Alter Postpartum Ovulation and Reproductive Measures J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2005; 88(7): 2401 - 2411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |