| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Animal Sciences and
2 Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801
Corresponding author: Geoffrey E. Dahl; email: gdahl{at}uiuc.edu.
Recent studies suggest that exposure of cattle to photoperiod can influence immune function. The objective of this study was to determine whether treatment of cows with short day photoperiod (SDPP; 8 h light: 16 h darkness) during the dry period alters immune function, relative to cows subjected to a long day photoperiod (LDPP; 16 h light: 8 h darkness). Multiparous Holstein cows (n = 39) were dried 62 d before calving and exposed to photoperiod treatment until parturition; thereafter, cows were exposed to natural photoperiod. General health was monitored weekly during the dry period and cellular immune function was examined monthly during the dry period and at calving. Concentrations of prolactin and cortisol were measured from 10 d before calving to 2 d after calving. The periparturient prolactin surge in plasma was greater in LDPP cows (54.6 ng/ mL) than SDPP (22.4 ng/mL). Relative to LDPP cows, neutrophil chemotaxis and lymphocyte proliferation were enhanced in SDPP cows during the dry period. Neutrophil chemotaxis averaged 142.5 and 178.8 cells/ well during the dry period for LDPP and SDPP, respectively. Lymphocyte proliferation during the dry period averaged 197.6 and 326.5% for LDPP and SDPP cows, respectively. Physiological characteristics of the cows were not affected by treatment during the dry period. However, differences between treatments were observed within 2 d of parturition. Potential implications of photoperiod management for cow health and well-being merit further investigation.
Key Words: photoperiod • dry period • immune function
Abbreviation key: C5a = complement 5a, ConA = concanavalin A, LDPP = long day photoperiod, PRL = prolactin, PRL-R = prolactin receptor, SDPP = short day photoperiod
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. C. do Amaral, E. E. Connor, S. Tao, J. Hayen, J. Bubolz, and G. E. Dahl Heat-stress abatement during the dry period: Does cooling improve transition into lactation? J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2009; 92(12): 5988 - 5999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. E. Dahl Effects of short day photoperiod on prolactin signaling in dry cows: A common mechanism among tissues and environments? J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(13_suppl): 10 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Niekamp, M. A. Sutherland, G. E. Dahl, and J. L. Salak-Johnson Immune responses of piglets to weaning stress: Impacts of photoperiod J Anim Sci, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 93 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Niekamp, M. A. Sutherland, G. E. Dahl, and J. L. Salak-Johnson Photoperiod influences the immune status of multiparous pregnant sows and their piglets J Anim Sci, August 1, 2006; 84(8): 2072 - 2082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. G. Rius, E. E. Connor, A. V. Capuco, P. E. Kendall, T. L. Auchtung-Montgomery, and G. E. Dahl Long-Day Photoperiod that Enhances Puberty Does Not Limit Body Growth in Holstein Heifers J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2005; 88(12): 4356 - 4365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
