HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Adesogan, A. T. Articles by Dewhurst, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Adesogan, A. T. Articles by Dewhurst, R. J.

Reducing Concentrate Supplementation in Dairy Cow Diets While Maintaining Milk Production with Pea-Wheat Intercrops^*

A. T. Adesogan^1,, M. B. Salawu^1,, S. P. Williams¹, W. J. Fisher² and R. J. Dewhurst²

¹ Institute of Rural Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3AL, United Kingdom
² Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB, United Kingdom

Corresponding author: A. T. Adesogan; e-mail: adesogan{at}animal.ufl.edu.

In the first of 2 experiments, 40 dairy cows were used to evaluate the milk production potential and concentrate-sparing effect of feeding dairy cows a basal diet of pea-wheat intercrop silages instead of perennial rye-grass silage (GS). Dairy cows were offered GS or 2 intercrop silages prepared from wheat and either Magnus peas (MW, a tall-straw variety) or Setchey peas (SW, a short-straw variety) ad libitum. The respective intercrops were supplemented with 4 kg/d of a dairy concentrate (CP = 240 g/kg dry matter; MW4 and SW4), and the GS were supplemented with 4 (GS4) or 8 (GS8) kg/d of the same concentrate. The second experiment measured the forage DM intake, digestibility, rumen function, and microbial protein synthesis from the forages by offering them alone to 3, nonlactating cows (3 x 3 Latin square design with 21-d periods). Forage dry matter intake was greater in cows fed the intercrop silages than those fed GS. Milk production was greater in cows fed SW4 than those fed GS4 or MW4, but similar to cows fed GS8. Dietary treatment did not affect milk fat, protein, or lactose concentrations. The intercrops had greater N retention, and were more digestible than the GS, and these factors probably contributed to the greater forage DM intakes and greater milk production from the intercrop silages compared with the GS. Rumen volatile fatty acid concentrations were similar across forages, but urinary purine derivative excretion was greater in the cows fed the intercrop silages than the GS, suggesting that rumen microbial protein synthesis was enhanced by feeding the intercrops. In conclusion, similar milk yield and milk composition can be obtained by feeding SW and 4 kg of concentrates as that obtained with GS and 8 kg of concentrates. Feeding intercrop silages instead of GS with the same amount of concentrates increased forage intakes, N retention, and microbial protein synthesis.

Key Words: bi-crop • cereal-legume • rumen function • pea-wheat

Abbreviation key: GS = grass silage, GS4 = GS + 4 kg/d concentrates, GS8 = GS + 8 kg/d concentrates, MW = magnus pea/wheat intercrop silage, MW4 = MW + 4 kg/d concentrates, SW = Setchey pea/wheat intercrop silage, SW4 = SW + 4 kg/d concentrates, WSC = water-soluble carbohydrates