|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Dairy and Animal Science and
2 Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802
Corresponding author: R. S. Kensinger; e-mail: rsk7{at}psu.edu
Significant culling of high-producing cows with low fertility reduces profitability of dairy farms as those cows are replaced with heifers. Induced lactation of nonpregnant cows may be a management alternative to reduce culling and increase profits. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of bovine somatotropin (bST) to increase milk production in cows induced into lactation with estrogen plus progesterone, and to determine the profitability of inducing cows into lactation vs. using replacement heifers entering the herd as first-lactation cows. Parity 1 or greater, nonpregnant, healthy Holstein cows (n = 28) were induced into lactation by administration of estradiol-17ß (0.075 mg/kg of body weight [BW] per d) and progesterone (0.25 mg/kg of BW per d) for 7 d. Milking began on d 18. Cows were randomly assigned to control or bST treatment groups on d 37 ± 20 of milking, and milk production was compared for 70 d. After the 70-d comparison, all cows received bST for the duration of lactation. Cows receiving bST produced more milk (28.4 kg/d) than controls (24.1 kg/d), with variable yields among cows. For the economic analysis, induced cows were compared to first-lactation cows in the same herd using fair market value for costs and multiple component pricing for milk. Net present value for an induced cow ($1966) was significantly greater than that for a first-lactation cow ($1446). Our data suggest that bST use in induced cows is profitable. If a reliable method were developed and approved by the FDA, inducing nonpregnant cows into lactation could be used by dairy producers to increase profitability.
Key Words: induced lactation somatotropin economics dairy cattle
Abbreviation key: rbPRL = recombinant bovine prolactin;, NPV = net present value.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. R. Andrade, A. A. K. Salama, G. Caja, V. Castillo, E. Albanell, and X. Such Response to Lactation Induction Differs by Season of Year and Breed of Dairy Ewes J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2008; 91(6): 2299 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. K. Salama, G. Caja, E. Albanell, S. Carne, R. Casals, and X. Such Mammogenesis and Induced Lactation With or Without Reserpine in Nulliparous Dairy Goats J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3751 - 3757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |