HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Interpretive Summary Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by VanRaden, P. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by VanRaden, P. M.

Invited Review: Selection on Net Merit to Improve Lifetime Profit

Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705–2350

Genetic selection has made dairy cows more profit-able producers of milk. Genetic evaluations began with 2 traits measured on a few cows but now include many traits measured on millions of cows. Selection indexes from USDA included yield traits beginning in 1971, productive life and somatic cell score beginning in 1994, conformation traits in 2000, and cow fertility and calving ease in 2003. This latest revision of net merit should result in 2% more progress, worth $5 million/yr nationally, with improved cow health and fitness, but slightly less progress for yield. Fertility and longevity evaluations have similar reliability because cows can have several fertility records, each with lower heritability, compared with one longevity record with higher heritability. Lifetime profit can be estimated more accurately if less heritable traits are evaluated and included instead of ignored. Milk volume has a positive value for fluid use, but a negative value for cheese production. Thus, multiple selection indexes are needed for different markets and production systems. Breeding programs should estimate future rather than current costs and prices. Many other nations have derived selection indexes similar to US net merit.

Key Words: selection index • net merit • genetic progress

Abbreviation key: CM$ = cheese merit, DCE = daughter calving ease, DPR = daughter pregnancy rate, FM$ = fluid merit, NM$ = net merit, PL = productive life, SCE = service sire calving ease

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Walsh, F. Buckley, D. P. Berry, M. Rath, K. Pierce, N. Byrne, and P. Dillon Effects of Breed, Feeding System, and Parity on Udder Health and Milking Characteristics J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5767 - 5779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Cole, G. R. Wiggans, P. M. VanRaden, and R. H. Miller Stillbirth (Co)Variance Components for a Sire-Maternal Grandsire Threshold Model and Development of a Calving Ability Index for Sire Selection J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2489 - 2496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Rozzi, F. Miglior, and K. J. Hand A Total Merit Selection Index for Ontario Organic Dairy Farmers J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1584 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. D. Norman, J. L. Hutchison, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, and T. J. Lawlor Selection on Yield and Fitness Traits When Culling Holsteins During the First Three Lactations J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 1008 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. E. Shook Major advances in determining appropriate selection goals. J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2006; 89(4): 1349 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Kearney, P. R. Amer, and B. Villanueva Cumulative Discounted Expressions of Sire Genotypes for the Complex Vertebral Malformation and {beta}-Casein Loci in Commercial Dairy Herds J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2005; 88(12): 4426 - 4433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]