JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tenhagen, B.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Heuwieser, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tenhagen, B.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Heuwieser, W.
J. Dairy Sci. 87:85-94
© American Dairy Science Association, 2004.

Comparison of Timed AI After Synchronized Ovulation to AI at Estrus: Reproductive and Economic Considerations

B.-A. Tenhagen, M. Drillich, R. Surholt and W. Heuwieser

Clinic for Reproduction, Section of Production Medicine and Quality Management, Free University of Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany

Corresponding author: B.-A. Tenhagen; e-mail: tenhagen{at}bestandsbetreuung.de.

A timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol using OvSynch was compared to artificial insemination (AI) at detected estrus in 2 large dairy herds differing in reproductive management. Cows were synchronized for TAI starting at 62 and 42 d in milk in herds 1 and 2, respectively. The OvSynch regimen included: GnRH (buserelin) at 0.02 mg (i.m.) on d 0; PGF2{alpha} (tiaprost) at 0.75 mg (i.m.) on d 7; buserelin at 0.02 mg (i.m.) on d 9; and TAI 16 to 20 h later. After TAI, cows seen in estrus received AI, whereas cows diagnosed not pregnant were resynchronized for TAI. Control cows received AI based on detected estrus after voluntary waiting periods of 72 d in herd 1 and 50 d in herd 2. An economic analysis included costs associated with days open, culling, AI, synchrony products, treatment, and examinations. A sensitivity analysis of those variables determined effects on total costs per pregnancy. Use of OvSynch reduced intervals to first AI and days open in both herds and reduced culling for infertility in herd 2. Conception rates for first AI at detected estrus were significantly higher compared to TAI in both herds and for overall AI at estrus in herd 2. For groups assigned to AI at estrus, mean 21-d submission rates over 200 d for AI were higher in herd 1 than in herd 2 (55.6 vs. 28.6%). Days open and culling were the major cost factors. Although OvSynch improved reproduction in both herds, AI based on detected estrus was economically superior in herd 1, whereas OvSynch was superior in herd 2. This was consistent across ranges of cost factors evaluated. Evaluation of synchrony protocols should include reproductive performance along with appropriate costs associated with treatments. Such costs may offset benefits to reproduction in herds with good estrous detection rates.

Key Words: dairy cow • OvSynch • reproductive performance • economics

Abbreviation key: CL = corpus luteum, IDE 1, IDE 2 = insemination at detected estrus or specifically in herds 1 and 2, respectively, OvSynch 1, OvSynch 2 = synchronization regimen for timed insemination or specifically in herds 1 and 2, respectively, PD = pregnancy diagnosis, TAI = timed AI, VWP = voluntary waiting period




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman
Modeling Nuisance Variables for Prediction of Service Sire Fertility
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2008; 91(7): 2823 - 2835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
K. N. Galvao, J. E. P. Santos, R. L. Cerri, R. C. Chebel, H. M. Rutigliano, R. G. Bruno, and R. C. Bicalho
Evaluation of Methods of Resynchronization for Insemination in Cows of Unknown Pregnancy Status
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4240 - 4252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. H. Miller, H. D. Norman, M. T. Kuhn, J. S. Clay, and J. L. Hutchison
Voluntary Waiting Period and Adoption of Synchronized Breeding in Dairy Herd Improvement Herds
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1594 - 1606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and G. R. Wiggans
Characterization of Holstein Heifer Fertility in the United States
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4907 - 4920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. C. Chebel, J. E. P. Santos, R. L. A. Cerri, H. M. Rutigliano, and R. G. S. Bruno
Reproduction in dairy cows following progesterone insert presynchronization and resynchronization protocols.
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2006; 89(11): 4205 - 4219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. L. A. Cerri, J. E. P. Santos, S. O. Juchem, K. N. Galvao, and R. C. Chebel
Timed Artificial Insemination with Estradiol Cypionate or Insemination at Estrus in High-Producing Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2004; 87(11): 3704 - 3715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.