| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Animal Science and
2 Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695
To whom correspondence should be addressed.
This study evaluated the effects of dilution rate and forage-to-concentrate ratio on gas production by rumen microbes. Continuous cultures were used to monitor methane production at three liquid dilution rates (3.2, 6.3, or 12.5%/h) and three forage-to-concentrate ratios (70:30, 50:50, or 30:70). Filtered ruminal contents were allowed 6 d of adaptation to diets followed by 7 d of data collection. Forage consisted of pelleted alfalfa and the concentrate mix included ground corn, soybean meal, and a mineral and vitamin premix. The experiment was replicated in a split-plot design. Total volatile fatty acid production averaged 58.0 mmol/d and was not affected by treatment. Molar proportion of acetate increased with increasing forage-to-concentrate ratio. Molar proportion of propionate tended to decrease at dilution rate of 12.5%/h and increased with the medium and low forage-to-concentrate ratio. Culture pH tended to be greater at a dilution rate of 12.5%/h. Methane production that was calculated from stoichiometric equations was not affected by treatments. However, methane production based on methane concentration in fermentor headspace resulted in an interaction effect of treatments. Stoichiometric equations underestimated methane output at higher dilution rates and with high forage diets. Total diet fermentability was lowest at dilution rate of 3.2%/h. Increasing dilution rates increased microbial yield; increasing the proportion of concentrate improved microbial efficiency. Dilution rate and forage-to-concentrate ratio altered the partition of substrate by microbes. Methane production based on actual concentrations differed from values estimated using stoichiometry of end-product appearance.
Key Words: continuous culture • methane production • stoichiometric equation • microbial energetics
Abbreviation key: A:P = acetate-to-propionate, F:C = forage-to-concentrate ratio, HF = high forage (70 forage:30 concentrate), LF = low forage (30 forage:70 concentrate), MF = medium forage (50 forage:50 concentrate)
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G. I. Zanton and A. J. Heinrichs Review: Limit-Feeding with Altered Forage-to-Concentrate Levels in Dairy Heifer Diets Professional Animal Scientist, August 1, 2009; 25(4): 393 - 403. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. E. Martinez, M. J. Ranilla, S. Ramos, M. L. Tejido, and M. D. Carro Effects of dilution rate and retention time of concentrate on efficiency of microbial growth, methane production, and ruminal fermentation in Rusitec fermenters J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 3930 - 3938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Fellner, J. C. Burns, and D. S. Marshall Effect of Feeding Corn, Hull-Less or Hulled Barley on Fermentation by Mixed Cultures of Ruminal Microorganisms J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2008; 91(5): 1936 - 1941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Seo, L. O. Tedeschi, C. G. Schwab, B. D. Garthwaite, and D. G. Fox Evaluation of the passage rate equations in the 2001 Dairy NRC model. J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2006; 89(6): 2327 - 2342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
