JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kebreab, E.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kebreab, E.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, C. K.
J. Dairy Sci. 86:2904-2913
© American Dairy Science Association, 2003.

Alternatives to Linear Analysis of Energy Balance Data from Lactating Dairy Cows

E. Kebreab*, J. France*, R. E. Agnew{dagger}, T. Yan{dagger}, M. S. Dhanoa{ddagger}, J. Dijkstra§, D. E. Beever* and C. K. Reynolds*,1

* School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, The University of Reading, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR, United Kingdom
{dagger} The Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down, Northern Ireland BT26 6DR, United Kingdom
{ddagger} Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3EB, United Kingdom
§ Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, Marijkeweg 40,6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands

Corresponding author: E. Kebreab; e-mail: e.kebreab{at}reading.ac.uk.

The current energy requirements system used in the United Kingdom for lactating dairy cows utilizes key parameters such as metabolizable energy intake (MEI) at maintenance (MEm), the efficiency of utilization of MEI for 1) maintenance, 2) milk production (kl), 3) growth (kg), and the efficiency of utilization of body stores for milk production (kt). Traditionally, these have been determined using linear regression methods to analyze energy balance data from calorimetry experiments. Many studies have highlighted a number of concerns over current energy feeding systems particularly in relation to these key parameters, and the linear models used for analyzing. Therefore, a database containing 652 dairy cow observations was assembled from calorimetry studies in the United Kingdom. Five functions for analyzing energy balance data were considered: straight line, two diminishing returns functions, (the Mitscherlich and the rectangular hyperbola), and two sigmoidal functions (the logistic and the Gompertz). Meta-analysis of the data was conducted to estimate kg and kt. Values of 0.83 to 0.86 and 0.66 to 0.69 were obtained for kg and kt using all the functions (with standard errors of 0.028 and 0.027), respectively, which were considerably different from previous reports of 0.60 to 0.75 for kg and 0.82 to 0.84 for kt. Using the estimated values of kg and kt, the data were corrected to allow for body tissue changes. Based on the definition of kl as the derivative of the ratio of milk energy derived from MEI to MEI directed towards milk production, MEm and kl were determined. Meta-analysis of the pooled data showed that the average kl ranged from 0.50 to 0.58 and MEm ranged between 0.34 and 0.64 MJ/kg of BW0.75 per day. Although the constrained Mitscherlich fitted the data as good as the straight line, more observations at high energy intakes (above 2.4 MJ/kg of BW0.75 per day) are required to determine conclusively whether milk energy is related to MEI linearly or not.

Key Words: energy metabolism • dairy cow • lactation

Abbreviation key: BIC = Bayesian information criteria, El = energy in milk (MJ/d), kg = the marginal efficiency of utilization of MEI for growth, kl = the marginal efficiency of utilization of MEI for milk production, km = the marginal efficiency of utilization of MEI for maintenance, kt = the marginal efficiency of utilization of body stores for milk production, MBW = metabolic body weight (kg0.75), ME = metabolizable energy, MEI = ME intake (MJ/kg0.75/d), MEm = ME requirement for maintenance (MJ/kg0.75/d), Tg = tissue gain (MJ/kg0.75/d), Tl = tissue loss (MJ/kg0.75/d)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. Schulin-Zeuthen, E. Kebreab, W. J. J. Gerrits, S. Lopez, M. Z. Fan, R. S. Dias, and J. France
Meta-analysis of phosphorus balance data from growing pigs
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 1953 - 1961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. L. Ellis, F. Qiao, and J. P. Cant
Evaluation of Net Energy Expenditures of Dairy Cows According to Body Weight Changes over a Full Lactation
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1546 - 1557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.