| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
* Department of Animal & Dairy Science,
Department of Crop & Soil Science, and
# Department of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, University of Georgia, Tifton 31793
Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Griffin 30223
Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory and
|| Forage & Turf Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Tifton 31793
Corresponding author:
G. Larry Newton; e-mail
fig{at}tifton.uga.edu.
Concentrated sources of dairy manure represent significant water pollution potential. The southern United States may be more vulnerable to water quality problems than some other regions because of climate, typical farm size, and cropping practices. Dairy manure can be an effective source of plant nutrients and large quantities of nutrients can be recycled through forage production, especially when multi-cropping systems are utilized. Linking forage production with manure utilization is an environmentally sound approach for addressing both of these problems. Review of two triple-crop systems revealed greater N and P recoveries for a corn silage-bermudagrass hay-rye haylage system, whereas forage yields and quality were greater for a corn silage-corn silage-rye haylage system, when manure was applied at rates to supply N. Nutrient uptake was lower than application during the autumn-winter period, and bermudagrass utilized more of the remaining excess than a second crop of corn silage. Economic comparison of these systems suggests that the added value of the two corn silage crop system was not enough to off-set its increased production cost. Therefore, the system that included bermudagrss demonstrated both environmental and economic advantages. Review of the N and P uptake and calculated crop value of various single, double, and triple crop forage systems indicated that the per hectare economic value as well as the N and P uptakes tended to follow DM yields, and grasses tended to out-perform broadleaf forages. Taken across all systems, systems that included bermudagrass tended to have some of the highest economic values and uptakes of N and P. Manure applied at rates to supply N results in application of excess P, and production will not supply adequate quantities of forage to meet the herd’s needs. Systems that lower manure application and supply supplemental N to produce all necessary forage under manure application will likely be less economically attractive due to additional costs of moving manure further and applying it to greater land areas, but will be environmentally necessary in most cases. Intensive forage systems can produce acceptable to high quality forage, protect the environment, and be economically attractive. The optimal manure-forage system will depend on the farm characteristics and specific local conditions. Buffers and nutrient sinks can protect streams and water bodies from migrating nutrients and should be included as a part of crop production systems.
Key Words: manure • forages • water quality • riparian buffers
Abbreviation key: CCR = corn silage-corn silage-rye haylage triple crop forage system, CBR = corn silage-bermudagrass hay-rye haylage triple crop forage system, NMP = nutrient management plan
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. C. Newman, S. Agyin-Birikorang, M. B. Adjei, J. M. Scholberg, M. L. Silveira, J. M. B. Vendramini, J. E. Rechcigl, L. E. Sollenberger, and M. Chrysostome Enhancing Phosphorus Phytoremedation Potential of Two Warm-Season Perennial Grasses with Nitrogen Fertilization Agron. J., November 1, 2009; 101(6): 1345 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. K. Obour, M. L. Silveira, M.B. Adjei, J. M. Vendramini, and J. E. Rechcigl Cattle Manure Application Strategies Effects on Bahiagrass Yield, Nutritive Value, and Phosphorus Recovery Agron. J., September 1, 2009; 101(5): 1099 - 1107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. C. Newman, S. Agyin-Birikorang, M. B. Adjei, J. M. Scholberg, M. L. Silveira, J. M. B. Vendramini, J. E. Rechcigl, and L. E. Sollenberger Nitrogen Fertilization Effect on Phosphorus Remediation Potential of Three Perennial Warm-Season Forages Agron. J., August 31, 2009; 101(5): 1243 - 1248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. J. Butler, K. J. Han, J. P. Muir, D. C. Weindorf, and L. Lastly Dairy Manure Compost Effects on Corn Silage Production and Soil Properties Agron. J., October 21, 2008; 100(6): 1541 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. D. Brown Winter Cereal-Corn Double Crop Forage Production and Phosphorus Removal Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 20, 2006; 70(6): 1951 - 1956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. K. Pant, M. B. Adjei, J. M. S. Scholberg, C. G. Chambliss, and J. E. Rechcigl Forage Production and Phosphorus Phytoremediation in Manure-Impacted Soils Agron. J., November 1, 2004; 96(6): 1780 - 1786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
