JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fikse, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Weigel, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fikse, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Weigel, K. A.
J. Dairy Sci. 86:1821-1827
© American Dairy Science Association, 2003.

Genotype x Environment Interaction for Milk Production in Guernsey Cattle

W. F. Fikse*, R. Rekaya{dagger} and K. A. Weigel{ddagger}

* Interbull Centre, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
{dagger} Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens 30602
{ddagger} Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

Corresponding author: F. Fikse; e-mail:
Freddy.Fikse{at}hgen.slu.se.

International genetic evaluations that use national genetic evaluation results as input need to acknowledge country boundaries. The current model for international evaluation treats each country as a genetically separate trait, i.e., assumes milk production to be similar within country, but different between countries. The use of cow performance records does not require such restriction, and allows for other statistical models to consider genotype x environment interaction. First-lactation records from 40,000 Guernsey cows in four countries (Australia, Canada, United States, and South Africa) were used to detect and describe genotype x environment interaction for milk production traits. Five statistical models were considered: single-trait across-county (ST), single-trait across-country with heterogeneous residual variance (SThet), multiple-trait across-country (MT), multiple-trait herd cluster model (HC), and reaction norm model (RR). For the herd cluster model, herds were clustered into groups based on information on herd management, genetic composition, and climate. Reaction norms describe the phenotype expressed by a genotype as a function of the environment, and was modeled by random regression on the herd average for peak milk yield as the descriptor of production environment. Gibbs sampling was used to make inferences about the parameters of interest, and models were compared based on goodness of fit and deviance information criterion. Posterior mode of the heritability for the single-trait model was 0.32, and ranged from 0.15 to 0.53 for models SThet and MT. Posterior mode of the genetic correlations between countries estimated with model MT were generally high (0.78 to 0.90). However, posterior SD were high (up to 0.15 for Australia–South Africa), and values near unity for the genetic correlations were not unlikely. Model HC gave more precise inferences but lower goodness of fit compared with model MT. Results from model RR provided evidence for heterogeneity of genetic variances. This model was least supported by the data, probably because heterogeneity of residual variances was not considered. Among the models in this study, the one with homogeneous genetic and heterogeneous residual variances across countries fitted best to the data, and we expect a model for which the assumption of homogeneous genetic variance is relaxed to show an even better fit to the data.

Key Words: international genetic evaluation • Guernsey • lactation records

Abbreviation key: DIC = deviance information criterion, HC = multiple-trait herd cluster model, ST = single-trait model, SThet = single-trait model with heterogeneous residual variance across countries, MT = multiple-trait across country model, RR = reaction norm model (random regression)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
M. Lillehammer, M. E. Goddard, H. Nilsen, E. Sehested, H. G. Olsen, S. Lien, and T. H. E. Meuwissen
Quantitative Trait Locus-by-Environment Interaction for Milk Yield Traits on Bos taurus Autosome 6
Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1539 - 1546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. M. Shariati, G. Su, P. Madsen, and D. Sorensen
Analysis of Milk Production Traits in Early Lactation Using a Reaction Norm Model with Unknown Covariates
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5759 - 5766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. R. Bryant, N. Lopez-Villalobos, J. E. Pryce, C. W. Holmes, D. L. Johnson, and D. J. Garrick
Environmental Sensitivity in New Zealand Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1538 - 1547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Konig, G. Dietl, I. Raeder, and H. H. Swalve
Genetic Relationships for Dairy Performance Between Large-Scale and Small-Scale Farm Conditions
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 4087 - 4096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. Maltecca, A. Bagnato, and K. A. Weigel
Comparison of International Dairy Sire Evaluations from Meta-Analysis of National Estimated Breeding Values and Direct Analysis of Individual Animal Performance Records
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2004; 87(8): 2599 - 2605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.