JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagner-Storch, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wagner-Storch, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Palmer, R. W.
J. Dairy Sci. 86:1494-1502
© American Dairy Science Association, 2003.

Feeding Behavior, Milking Behavior, and Milk Yields of Cows Milked in a Parlor Versus an Automatic Milking System

A. M. Wagner-Storch and R. W. Palmer

Department of Dairy Science University of Wisconsin, Madison WI 53706

Corresponding author:
R. W. Palmer; e-mail:
rwpalmer{at}facstaff.wisc.edu.

This study compared feeding and milking behavior and milk yields for cows housed in the same barn, fed the same ration, but milked with a conventional milking parlor (parlor) or automatic milking system (robot). Behavioral data were videotaped hourly 1 d/mo for 9 mo. Feeding behavior patterns differed and were more variable for parlor cows than for robot cows. Both groups had low feeding rates at night and early morning. Feeding activity increased after milking and feed delivery for parlor cows. Milking and feeding activity in the robot system increased after human intervention at 7 a.m.; feed bunk activity peaked 3 h later and remained relatively constant from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. Percentages of cows at the feed bunk were significantly greater for robot cows than parlor cows only at 10 a.m. and 9 p.m. Batch milking of parlor cows with free access to feed, vs. sequential milking of robot cows, with restricted movement to feed by a one-way gate system, resulted in higher peak percentages of cows at the bunk for parlor cows. Lower, more consistent percentages of cows eating at one time suggests that less bunk space may be needed for cows in robotic milking systems. Higher percentages of cows were observed in the robot from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. and again from 3 to 7 p.m. Percentages of cows in the robot holding area were greatest from 8 to 11 a.m. and 3 to 6 p.m. and were lowest from midnight to 6 a.m. Milk production over 39 d in summer for subsets of cows was slightly but significantly higher (26.4 vs. 25.8 ± 0.2 kg/d) for cows in the robot group. Milking frequency, days in milk, parity, and maximum air temperature for 3 d (-2 d to day of observation) affected milk yield comparisons. Results have implications for design of feeding and handling facilities used with automated milking systems.

Key Words: cow behavior • automatic milking system • feeding behavior • milk yield

Abbreviation key: parlor = double-6 herringbone parlor, robot = automated milking system




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. M. Svennersten-Sjaunja and G. Pettersson
Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(13_suppl): 37 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Bach, C. Iglesias, S. Calsamiglia, and M. Devant
Effect of Amount of Concentrate Offered in Automatic Milking Systems on Milking Frequency, Feeding Behavior, and Milk Production of Dairy Cattle Consuming High Amounts of Corn Silage
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5049 - 5055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Speroni, G. Pirlo, and S. Lolli
Effect of Automatic Milking Systems on Milk Yield in a Hot Environment
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4687 - 4693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. L. Mentink and N. B. Cook
Short Communication: Feed Bunk Utilization in Dairy Cows Housed in Pens with Either Two or Three Rows of Free Stalls
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 134 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
F. Abeni, L. Calamari, F. Calza, M. Speroni, G. Bertoni, and G. Pirlo
Welfare Assessment Based on Metabolic and Endocrine Aspects in Primiparous Cows Milked in a Parlor or with an Automatic Milking System
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2005; 88(10): 3542 - 3552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. J. DeVries and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk
Time of Feed Delivery Affects the Feeding and Lying Patterns of Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2005; 88(2): 625 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. Muller and L. Schrader
Individual Consistency of Dairy Cows' Activity in Their Home Pen
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2005; 88(1): 171 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Miron, M. Nikbachat, A. Zenou, D. Ben-Ghedalia, R. Solomon, E. Shoshani, I. Halachmi, N. Livshin, A. Antler, and E. Maltz
Lactation Performance and Feeding Behavior of Dairy Cows Supplemented Via Automatic Feeders with Soy Hulls or Barley Based Pellets
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2004; 87(11): 3808 - 3815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Miron, E. Yosef, M. Nikbachat, A. Zenou, E. Maltz, I. Halachmi, and D. Ben-Ghedalia
Feeding Behavior and Performance of Dairy Cows Fed Pelleted Nonroughage Fiber Byproducts
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2004; 87(5): 1372 - 1379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. J. DeVries, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and K. A. Beauchemin
Short Communication: Diurnal Feeding Pattern of Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2003; 86(12): 4079 - 4082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.