JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, P. Y. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kitts, D. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, P. Y. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kitts, D. D.
J. Dairy Sci. 86:746-754
© American Dairy Science Association, 2003.

A Comparison of the Buttermilk Solids Functional Properties to Nonfat Dried Milk, Soy Protein Isolate, Dried Egg White, and Egg Yolk Powders

P. Y. Y. Wong and D. D. Kitts

Food, Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Corresponding author:
D. D. Kitts; e-mail:
ddkitts{at}interchange.ubc.ca.

Physicochemical (i.e., sulfhydryl group, protein, and total solubility) as well as functional properties (i.e., water-holding and fat-absorption capacity, foaming and emulsification capacity, and stability) of commercial buttermilk solids (BMS) were compared to nonfat dried milk, soy protein isolate, and dried egg yolk and egg white powders on an equivalent protein basis. BMS showed limited functional properties in water-holding capacity (0.75 g water/g protein) and fat-absorption capacity (1.2 g of oil/g of protein), and foaming capacity (0.5 ml of foam/ml of solution) and stability. However, emulsifying capacity and stability of BMS was not significantly different from other dried protein powders. Results indicated that 0.9 g of protein (approximately 0.45%, wt/vol, concentration) from BMS was needed to emulsify a maximum oil concentration of 50% in water at temperatures up to 50°C. Denaturation of protein, quantified by free sulfhydryl groups, was a critical factor affecting the functionality of BMS and all other protein powders tested. The milk fat globule membrane present in BMS did not enhance either emulsifying capacity or stability.

Key Words: buttermilk solids • nonfat dried milk • soy protein isolate • egg powder

Abbreviation key: BMS = buttermilk solids, DEW = dried egg white, DEY = dried egg yolk, EC = emulsifying capacity, ES = emulsifying stability, FAC = fat-absorption capacity, FC = foaming capacity, FS = foam stability, MFGM = milk fat globule membrane, NFDM = nonfat dried milk, o/w = oil in water, SPI = soy protein isolate, WHC = water-holding capacity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. Morin, Y. Pouliot, and M. Britten
Effect of Buttermilk Made from Creams with Different Heat Treatment Histories on Properties of Rennet Gels and Model Cheeses
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2008; 91(3): 871 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Jinjarak, A. Olabi, R. Jimenez-Flores, I. Sodini, and J. H. Walker
Sensory evaluation of whey and sweet cream buttermilk.
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2441 - 2450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
I. Sodini, P. Morin, A. Olabi, and R. Jimenez-Flores
Compositional and Functional Properties of Buttermilk: A Comparison Between Sweet, Sour, and Whey Buttermilk
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2006; 89(2): 525 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.