JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sevi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Muscio, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sevi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Muscio, A.
J. Dairy Sci. 86:3881-3890
© American Dairy Science Association, 2003.

Ventilation Effects on Air Quality and on the Yield and Quality of Ewe Milk in Winter

A. Sevi*, L. Taibi{dagger}, M. Albenzio*, M. Caroprese*, R. Marino* and A. Muscio*

* Dipartimento PRIME, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, 71100 Foggia, Italy
{dagger} Istituto Sperimentale per la Zootecnia, Via Napoli, 71020 Segezia-Foggia, Italy

Corresponding author: A. Sevi; e-mail: a.sevi{at}unifg.it.

The effects of ventilation on air quality, and on the welfare and production performance of dairy ewes were assessed in a 6-wk trial conducted during the winter of 2002. Thirty-six midlactation Comisana ewes were divided into three groups of 12, which were randomly balanced for parity, time of lambing, and number of lambs suckled. Treatments were low (LOV), moderate (MOV), and programmed ventilation regimen (PROV). In LOV and MOV rooms, fans provided 10 ventilation cycles of 40 min each at a fan speed of 1 and 2 m/s, respectively. In the PROV room, the fan was programmed to maintain a 70% relative humidity. Mean ventilation rates were 23, 47, and 73 m3/h per ewe in LOV, MOV, and PROV rooms, respectively. Air concentrations of microorganisms and dust, and of gaseous pollutants were measured twice weekly. Cell-mediated immune response to phytohemagglutinin at d 1, 21 and 42, and humoral response to chicken egg albumin at d 11, 21, 30, and 40 were determined. At d 39, ewes were injected with 2 IU of porcine adreno-corticotropic-hormone/kg body weight0.75, and subjected to blood sampling for evaluation of cortisol concentrations immediately before and 1, 2, and 4 h after adreno-corticotrophic-hormone injection. Milk yield was recorded daily. Individual milk samples were analyzed weekly for composition, renneting parameters, and somatic cell count. The LOV treatment resulted in higher air concentrations of NH3 and CO2 than the MOV and PROV treatments. Greater amounts of total and respirable dust were found in the PROV room than in the LOV and the MOV rooms. The LOV ewes had lower milk yield than the PROV ewes, lower milk casein content, and higher rate of clot formation than the MOV and PROV ewes. The ventilation regimen did not affect the immune and endocrine responses of the ewes. Results suggest that an intermittent ventilation regimen, providing a mean ventilation rate of 47 m3/h per ewe at a fan speed of 2 m/s, is required to sustain the yield and cheese-making ability of ewe milk during the winter season.

Key Words: air quality • milk renneting parameters • dairy ewe • ventilation

Abbreviation key: CoI = milk coagulating index, LOV = low ventilation, MOV = moderate ventilation, NE = net energy, PHA = phytohemagglutinin, PROV = programmed ventilation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Caroprese, M. Albenzio, G. Annicchiarico, and A. Sevi
Changes Occurring in Immune Responsiveness of Single- and Twin-Bearing Comisana Ewes During the Transition Period
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2006; 89(2): 562 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.