JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banavara, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rankin, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Banavara, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Rankin, S. A.
J. Dairy Sci. 86:3866-3875
© American Dairy Science Association, 2003.

Studies on Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Commercial Sweet Whey Powders

D. S. Banavara, D. Anupama and S. A. Rankin

Department of Food Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

Corresponding author: S. A. Rankin; e-mail: sarankin{at}wisc.edu.

The objective of this study was to characterize variation and interrelatedness among primary functional and compositional parameters of commercially available sweet whey powders. Samples representing different plants/processes and cheese types were assayed for foaming capacity, foam stability, pH, protein content, soluble protein, turbidity, color, particle size distribution, lipid, and moisture. Data were analyzed using principal component analysis. Foaming capacity and stability varied from 10 to 220% and 0.1 to 14 min, respectively. Protein content and solubility ranged from 8.5 to 17.6% and 3.7 to 14.1%, respectively. Lipid content of sweet whey powder varied from 0.03 to 2.00%. The two main functional properties, foaming and protein solubility, did not show significant correlation with each other. Foaming properties showed a positive correlation to particle size and L* or lightness value, and negative correlation to lipid content. Protein solubility showed positive correlation with protein content and negative correlation with turbidity of the sample. Foaming behavior, protein, and particle size attributes were the main variables responsible for grouping of samples. Sweet whey powders from the same dairy plants were grouped together. The direct or indirect significance of these relationships to processing is detailed in this study.

Key Words: sweet whey powder • physicochemical • functional properties

Abbreviation key: D(0.5) = mean size of 50th-percentile particles in a given sample, DE* = total color difference from standard white, D(m) = volume weighted mean size, F = lipid content, FC = foaming capacity, FS = foam stability, M = moisture, PC = protein content, PCA = principal component analysis, PS = particle size distribution, SWP = sweet whey powder, SPC = soluble protein content, T = turbidity, WPC = whey protein concentrate, WPI = whey protein isolate




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. A. Padiernos, S.-Y. Lim, B. G. Swanson, C. F. Ross, and S. Clark
High hydrostatic pressure modification of whey protein concentrate for use in low-fat whipping cream improves foaming properties
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2009; 92(7): 3049 - 3056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. A. Prososki, M. R. Etzel, and S. A. Rankin
Solvent Type Affects the Number, Distribution, and Relative Quantities of Volatile Compounds Found in Sweet Whey Powder
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 523 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
I. Sodini, P. Morin, A. Olabi, and R. Jimenez-Flores
Compositional and Functional Properties of Buttermilk: A Comparison Between Sweet, Sour, and Whey Buttermilk
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2006; 89(2): 525 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. T. Jones, K. J. Aryana, and J. N. Losso
Storage Stability of Lutein During Ripening of Cheddar Cheese
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2005; 88(5): 1661 - 1670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.