JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rehman, S. U.
Right arrow Articles by Yim, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rehman, S. U.
Right arrow Articles by Yim, B.
J. Dairy Sci. 86:3841-3848
© American Dairy Science Association, 2003.

Use of Dry Milk Protein Concentrate in Pizza Cheese Manufactured by Culture or Direct Acidification

S. U. Rehman, N. Y. Farkye and B. Yim

Dairy Products Technology Center, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 93407

Corresponding author: N. Y. Farkye; e-mail: nfarkye{at}calpoly.edu.

Milk protein concentrate (MPC) contains high concentrations of casein and calcium and low concentrations of lactose. Enrichment of cheese milk with MPC should, therefore, enhance yields and improve quality. The objectives of this study were: 1) to compare pizza cheese made by culture acidification using standardized whole milk (WM) plus skim milk (SM) versus WM plus MPC; and 2) compare cheese made using WM + MPC by culture acidification to that made by direct acidification. The experimental design is as follows: vat 1 = WM+ SM + culture (commercial thermophilic lactic acid bacteria), vat 2 = WM + MPC + culture, and vat 3 = WM + MPC + direct acid (2% citric acid). Each cheese milk was standardized to a protein-to-fat ratio of ~1.4. The experiment was repeated three times. Yield and composition of cheeses were determined by standard methods, whereas the proteolysis was assessed by urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and water-soluble N contents. Meltability of the cheeses was determined during 1 mo of storage, in addition to pizza making. The addition of MPC improved the yields from 10.34 ± 0.57% in vat 1 cheese to 14.50 ± 0.84% and 16.65 ± 2.23%, respectively, in vats 2 and 3 and cheeses. The percentage of fat and protein recoveries showed insignificant differences between the treatments, but TS recoveries were in the order, vat 2 > vat 3 > vat 1. Most of the compositional parameters were significantly affected by the different treatments. Vat 2 cheese had the highest calcium and lowest lactose contencentrations. Vat 3 cheese had the best meltability. Vat 1 cheese initially had better meltability than vat 2 cheese; however, the difference became insignificant after 28 d of storage at 4°C. Vat 3 cheese had the softest texture and produced large-sized blisters when baked on pizza. The lowest and highest levels of proteolysis were found in vats 2 and 3 cheeses, respectively. The study demonstrates the use of MPC in pizza cheese manufacture with improved yield both by culture acidification as well as direct acidification.

Key Words: pizza cheese • milk protein concentrate • acidification

Abbreviation key: MPC =milk protein concentrate, NFDM =nonfat dry milk, SM =skim milk, WM =whole milk




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. A. Ferrer, A. R. Hill, and M. Corredig
Rheological Properties of Rennet Gels Containing Milk Protein Concentrates
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2008; 91(3): 959 - 969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. Zisu and N. P. Shah
Low-Fat Mozzarella as Influenced by Microbial Exopolysaccharides, Preacidification, and Whey Protein Concentrate
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2005; 88(6): 1973 - 1985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.