JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Britt, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Britt, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, M. B.
J. Dairy Sci. 86:3796-3801
© American Dairy Science Association, 2003.

Efficiency of Converting Nutrient Dry Matter to Milk in Holstein Herds1

J. S. Britt*, R. C. Thomas{dagger}, N. C. Speer* and M. B. Hall{ddagger}

* Department of Agriculture, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green 42101-5376
{dagger} College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5517
{ddagger} Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611

Corresponding author: J. S. Britt; e-mail: jenks.britt{at}wku.edu.

Production of milk from feed dry matter intakes (DMI), called dairy or feed efficiency, is not commonly measured in dairy herds as is feed conversion to weight gain in swine, beef, and poultry; however, it has relevance to conversion of purchased input to salable product and proportion of dietary nutrients excreted. The purpose of this study was to identify some readily measured factors that affect dairy efficiency. Data were collected from 13 dairy herds visited 34 times over a 14-mo period. Variables measured included cool or warm season (high ambient temperature <21°C or >21°C, respectively), days in milk, DMI, milk yield, milk fat percent, herd size, dietary concentrations (DM basis) and kilograms of crude protein (CP), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and forage. Season, days in milk, CP % and forage % of diet DM, and kilograms of dietary CP affected dairy efficiency. When evaluated using a model containing the significant variables, dairy efficiency was lower in the warm season (1.31) than in the cool season (1.40). In terms of simple correlations, dairy efficiency was negatively correlated with days in milk (r = -0.529), DMI (r = -0.316), forage % (r = -0.430), NDF % (r = -0.308), and kilograms of forage (r = -0.516), NDF (r = -0.434), and ADF (r = -0.313), in the diet, respectively. Dairy efficiency was positively correlated with milk yield (r = 0.707). The same relative patterns of significance and correlation were noted for dairy efficiency calculated with 3.5% fat-corrected milk yield. Diets fed by the herds fell within such a small range of variation (mean ± standard deviation) for CP % (16.3 ± 0.696), NDF % (33.2 ± 2.68), and forage % (46.9 ± 5.56) that these would not be expected to be useful to evaluate the effect of excessive underfeeding or overfeeding of these dietary components. The negative relationships of dairy efficiency with increasing dietary fiber and forage may reflect the effect of decreased diet digestibility. The results of this study suggest that managing herd breeding programs to reduce average days in milk and providing a cooler environment for the cows may help to maximize dairy efficiency. The mechanisms for the effects of the dietary variables on dairy efficiency need to be understood and evaluated over a broader range of diets and conditions before more firm conclusions regarding their impact can be drawn.

Key Words: dairy efficiency • dairy cattle




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. J. Heins, L. B. Hansen, A. J. Seykora, A. R. Hazel, D. G. Johnson, and J. G. Linn
Crossbreds of Jersey x Holstein Compared with Pure Holsteins for Body Weight, Body Condition Score, Dry Matter Intake, and Feed Efficiency During the First One Hundred Fifty Days of First Lactation
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3716 - 3722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. M. Dann, R. J. Grant, K. W. Cotanch, E. D. Thomas, C. S. Ballard, and R. Rice
Comparison of Brown Midrib Sorghum-Sudangrass with Corn Silage on Lactational Performance and Nutrient Digestibility in Holstein Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2008; 91(2): 663 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Bach, C. Iglesias, M. Devant, and N. Rafols
Performance and Feeding Behavior of Primiparous Cows Loose Housed Alone or Together with Multiparous Cows
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 337 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J.-S. Eun and K. A. Beauchemin
Effects of a Proteolytic Feed Enzyme on Intake, Digestion, Ruminal Fermentation, and Milk Production
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2005; 88(6): 2140 - 2153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. J. Schingoethe, K. N. Linke, K. F. Kalscheur, A. R. Hippen, D. R. Rennich, and I. Yoon
Feed Efficiency of Mid-Lactation Dairy Cows Fed Yeast Culture During Summer
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2004; 87(12): 4178 - 4181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. N. Hristov, W. J. Price, and B. Shafii
A Meta-Analysis Examining the Relationship Among Dietary Factors, Dry Matter Intake, and Milk and Milk Protein Yield in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(7): 2184 - 2196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.