| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
* Department of Agroforestry Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain
Corresponding author: J. M. Peireira Gonzalez; e-mail: jpereira{at}lugo.usc.es.
Dairy farms in Galicia and elsewhere in Europe are going through a transition phase to adapt to modern dairy technology, improve labor efficiency, and increase in size and scale. Expanding a dairy herd and building housing for more cows can be very expensive. A poor decision during expansion can result in serious financial difficulties even to the point of making the farm economically unviable. Dairy managers must carefully evaluate existing alternatives and must select an optimal strategy. To aid this decision, a computer spreadsheet application has been developed that predicts the cost per cow and cost per unit of area of alternative designs as functions of the number of cows to be housed. The spreadsheet is, in principle, applicable to a wide variety of designs and to housing for livestock other than dairy cattle. However, the current database allows comparison among six of the dairy housing designs that have been used most widely in Galicia in recent years. From projected financial results of the developed model, it was concluded that differing designs were preferred for different farm circumstances. Preferred designs for farms with 60 to 200 cows were either four rows of facing free stalls or four rows of tail-to-tail free stalls, which have virtually the same costs. Whereas for farms with fewer than 60 cows, the preferred design was two rows of tail-to-tail free stalls, designs with three rows of free stalls were generally more costly per cow. Results of design calculations must be integrated with other farm management considerations in choosing a particular design.
Key Words: dairy farm • investment • cost • design
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
