HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) An erratum has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vetharaniam, I. Articles by Pleasants, A. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vetharaniam, I. Articles by Pleasants, A. B.

Modeling the Effect of Energy Status on Mammary Gland Growth and Lactation

I. Vetharaniam^*, S. R. Davis^*, M. Upsdell^*, E. S. Kolver and A. B. Pleasants^*

^* AgResearch Limited, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton, New Zealand
Dexcel Limited, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton, New Zealand

Corresponding author: I. Vetharaniam; e-mail: kumar.vetharaniam{at}agresearch.co.nz.

The impact of nutrition on lactation can be separated into acute effects, affecting day-to-day yield, and chronic effects, which govern the persistency of lactation and rate of decline of the lactation curve. A mathematical model of the mammary gland was constructed to investigate both acute and chronic effects. Mammary growth is expressed in terms of the dynamics of populations of active (secreting) and quiescent (engorged) alveoli. The secretion rate of active alveoli is expressed in terms of the energy status of the dam.

The model was fitted to data from a 2 x 2 factorial trial in which lactation curves were measured for heifers of two different genotypes (North American and New Zealand Holstein-Friesians) fed two different diets [grass and total mixed rations (TMR)]. Total formation of alveoli during pregnancy and lactation was statistically the same across all groups despite differences between diets, in the rate of formation of alveoli at parturition.

The senescence rate of alveoli was significantly higher for heifers fed grass compared with heifers fed TMR, which corresponds to better persistency for heifers fed TMR. Heifers fed TMR had a higher rate of reactivation of quiescent alveoli than heifers fed grass, which also contributes to increased persistence for heifers fed TMR. There was a genotype x diet interaction in the rate of quiescence of active alveoli: the North American-Grass group had a higher rate of quiescence than the other three groups, perhaps reflecting differences in selection pressures between the New Zealand and North American genotypes.

Key Words: mammary gland • modeling • nutrition • milk production

Abbreviation key: ME = metabolizable energy, PQ = pasture quality

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. D. Hanigan, A. G. Rius, E. S. Kolver, and C. C. Palliser A Redefinition of the Representation of Mammary Cells and Enzyme Activities in a Lactating Dairy Cow Model J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3816 - 3830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Ellis, F. Qiao, and J. P. Cant Prediction of Dry Matter Intake Throughout Lactation in a Dynamic Model of Dairy Cow Performance J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1558 - 1570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Hanigan, H. G. Bateman, J. G. Fadel, and J. P. McNamara Metabolic Models of Ruminant Metabolism: Recent Improvements and Current Status J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(e_suppl_1): E52 - E64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]