JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bachman, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Schairer, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bachman, K. C.
Right arrow Articles by Schairer, M. L.
J. Dairy Sci. 86:3027-3037
© American Dairy Science Association, 2003.

Invited Review: Bovine Studies on Optimal Lengths of Dry Periods1,2

K. C. Bachman and M. L. Schairer

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611

Corresponding author: K. C. Bachman; e-mail: bachman{at}animal.ufl.edu.

Milk production per cow has increased as a result of progressive changes in the genetics and management of the dairy animal population. A management constant during many decades of progress has been the widely adopted dry period length of 51 to 60 d. The scientific basis for that industry standard was examined to assess its validity as the appropriate standard for the modern dairy industry. If subsequent milk yields can be sustained fully after dry periods that are shorter than the current standard, then considerable milk is being forfeited by retaining longer dry periods. Conversely, failure to allow any dry period will result in a significant decrease in subsequent milk synthesis and secretion. Most studies to determine the minimum length of dry period required have involved retrospective analyses of observational data. Only five experiments have been reported in which dairy cows were assigned, at random, to planned 30- and 60-d dry periods. Estimates of the change in subsequent milk production when days dry were decreased from 50 to 57 d to 30 to 34 d ranged from a 10% decrease to a 1% increase. However, lower yields after shorter dry periods may be partially offset by greater milk yields in the previous lactation if such cows are milked 3 to 4 wk longer. Environmental factors that influence milk production as well as the biological processes that occur within the mammary gland during the nonlactating period must be considered when dry period lengths are compared. Importantly, additional animal trials that specifically assign cows randomly to the dry period lengths to be evaluated are needed to determine optimal dry period lengths for modern dairy cows in differing management scenarios.

Key Words: dry period • milk production • lactation • bovine

Abbreviation key: ME = mature equivalent




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. H. Klusmeyer, A. C. Fitzgerald, A. C. Fabellar, J. M. Ballam, R. A. Cady, and J. L. Vicini
Effect of recombinant bovine somatotropin and a shortened or no dry period on the performance of lactating dairy cows
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2009; 92(11): 5503 - 5511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. S. Gulay, M. J. Hayen, H. H. Head, and K. C. Bachman
Short communication: Effect of estrogen supplemented at dry-off on temporal changes in concentrations of lactose in blood plasma of Holstein cows
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 3815 - 3818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. T. Church, L. K. Fox, C. T. Gaskins, D. D. Hancock, and J. M. Gay
The Effect of a Shortened Dry Period on Intramammary Infections During the Subsequent Lactation
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2008; 91(11): 4219 - 4225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. M. Velasco, E. D. Reid, K. K. Fried, T. F. Gressley, R. L. Wallace, and G. E. Dahl
Short-Day Photoperiod Increases Milk Yield in Cows with a Reduced Dry Period Length
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3467 - 3473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. D. Watters, J. N. Guenther, A. E. Brickner, R. R. Rastani, P. M. Crump, P. W. Clark, and R. R. Grummer
Effects of Dry Period Length on Milk Production and Health of Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2008; 91(7): 2595 - 2603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. C. Fitzgerald, E. L. Annen-Dawson, L. H. Baumgard, and R. J. Collier
Evaluation of Continuous Lactation and Increased Milking Frequency on Milk Production and Mammary Cell Turnover in Primiparous Holstein Cows
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5483 - 5489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Pezeshki, J. Mehrzad, G. R. Ghorbani, H. R. Rahmani, R. J. Collier, and C. Burvenich
Effects of Short Dry Periods on Performance and Metabolic Status in Holstein Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5531 - 5541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman
Dry Period Length to Maximize Production Across Adjacent Lactations and Lifetime Production
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1713 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. S. Gulay, M. J. Hayen, H. H. Head, C. J. Wilcox, and K. C. Bachman
Milk Production from Holstein Half Udders After Concurrent Thirty- and Seventy-Day Dry Periods
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 3953 - 3962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. Gumen, R. R. Rastani, R. R. Grummer, and M. C. Wiltbank
Reduced Dry Periods and Varying Prepartum Diets Alter Postpartum Ovulation and Reproductive Measures
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2005; 88(7): 2401 - 2411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. H. Wall, T. L. Auchtung, G. E. Dahl, S. E. Ellis, and T. B. McFadden
Exposure to Short Day Photoperiod During the Dry Period Enhances Mammary Growth in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2005; 88(6): 1994 - 2003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. T. Kuhn and J. L. Hutchison
Methodology for Estimation of Days Dry Effects
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2005; 88(4): 1499 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. T. Kuhn, J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman
Characterization of Days Dry for United States Holsteins
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1147 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. L. Annen, R. J. Collier, M. A. McGuire, J. L. Vicini, J. M. Ballam, and M. J. Lormore
Effect of Modified Dry Period Lengths and Bovine Somatotropin on Yield and Composition of Milk from Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2004; 87(11): 3746 - 3761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. L. Annen, R. J. Collier, M. A. McGuire, and J. L. Vicini
Effects of Dry Period Length on Milk Yield and Mammary Epithelial Cells
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(13_suppl): E66 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. R. Grummer and R. R. Rastani
Why Reevaluate Dry Period Length?
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(13_suppl): E77 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.