| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
* Department of Dairy Science University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706
Interbull Centre, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-570 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Corresponding author:
N. Zwald; e-mail:
nrzwald{at}calshp.cals.wisc.edu.
The multiple-trait across country evaluation method is currently used for international genetic evaluation of dairy sires. This method simultaneously combines national estimated breeding value (EBV) of sires in all countries and produces a separate breeding value to be used in each of the 24 countries that participate in the service. The major drawbacks to this method are the large number of genetic parameters that must be estimated and the large number of EBV produced for each sire. In the current method, each sire receives an EBV for each separate environment, and environments change at the country borders. It is unreasonable to assume that each country contains only one homogeneous environment and that every country has a distinctly different environment from all others. In the present study, an alternative method for international sire evaluation was utilized. Herds were grouped according to important management, climatic, and genetic factors rather than country borders. Data consisted of 16,403,413 first lactation cows in Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, The Netherlands, New Zealand, South Africa, Switzerland, and the United States. Herds were grouped according to 13 descriptive herd variables, including temperature, rainfall, peak yield, persistency, herd-size, age at calving, seasonality of calving, standard deviation of milk yield, culling percentage, fat-to-protein ratio, days to peak yield, percent of North American Holstein genes, and average PTA milk of sires. Variables were weighted by their relative importance in explaining genotype by environment interactions between herds. Herds were grouped into seven clusters; clusters ranged in size from 4805 to 59,272 herds and 1,414,966 to 3,966,431 cows. The proposed model predicts EBV for dairy sires based on the production environment in which their progeny will perform, rather than the country where they will be located.
Key Words: international evaluation • genotype by environment interaction • herd clustering
Abbreviation key: Interbull = International Bull Evaluation Service, MACE = multiple-trait across country evaluation, SSE = Sum of squared errors
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  H. Hammami, B. Rekik, H. Soyeurt, C. Bastin, J. Stoll, and N. Gengler Genotype x Environment Interaction for Milk Yield in Holsteins Using Luxembourg and Tunisian Populations J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3661 - 3671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. J. Fulkerson, T. M. Davison, S. C. Garcia, G. Hough, M. E. Goddard, R. Dobos, and M. Blockey Holstein-Friesian Dairy Cows Under a Predominantly Grazing System: Interaction Between Genotype and Environment J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2008; 91(2): 826 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Vasconcelos, F. Santos, A. Bagnato, and J. Carvalheira Effects of Clustering Herds with Small-Sized Contemporary Groups in Dairy Cattle Genetic Evaluations J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2008; 91(1): 377 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Bryant, N. Lopez-Villalobos, J. E. Pryce, C. W. Holmes, D. L. Johnson, and D. J. Garrick Environmental Sensitivity in New Zealand Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1538 - 1547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. A. Mulder and P. Bijma Benefits of Cooperation Between Breeding Programs in the Presence of Genotype by Environment Interaction J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1727 - 1739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. A. Mulder, R. F. Veerkamp, B. J. Ducro, J. A. M. van Arendonk, and P. Bijma Optimization of Dairy Cattle Breeding Programs for Different Environments with Genotype by Environment Interaction J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2006; 89(5): 1740 - 1752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Konig, G. Dietl, I. Raeder, and H. H. Swalve Genetic Relationships for Dairy Performance Between Large-Scale and Small-Scale Farm Conditions J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 4087 - 4096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. B. Garcia-Peniche, B. G. Cassell, R. E. Pearson, and I. Misztal Comparisons of Holsteins with Brown Swiss and Jersey Cows on the Same Farm for Age at First Calving and First Calving Interval J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2005; 88(2): 790 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Maltecca, A. Bagnato, and K. A. Weigel Comparison of International Dairy Sire Evaluations from Meta-Analysis of National Estimated Breeding Values and Direct Analysis of Individual Animal Performance Records J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2004; 87(8): 2599 - 2605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. F. Ceron-Munoz, H. Tonhati, C. N. Costa, D. Rojas-Sarmiento, and D. M. Echeverri Echeverri Factors that Cause Genotype by Environment Interaction and Use of a Multiple-Trait Herd-Cluster Model for Milk Yield of Holstein Cattle from Brazil and Colombia J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2004; 87(8): 2687 - 2692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
