HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by St-Pierre, N. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by St-Pierre, N. R.

Reassessment of Biases in Predicted Nitrogen Flows to the Duodenum by NRC 2001

Department of Animal Sciences The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210¹

Corresponding author:
N. R. St-Pierre; e-mail:
st-pierre.8{at}osu.edu.

The appearance of numerous plots in recent literature from which the residuals are plotted against observed values (Y) to assess a model’s potential bias raises this question: should residuals be regressed against Y or against predicted values ()? The answer requires knowing the expected relationship under the assumption of an unbiased model. The objectives of this paper are: 1) to derive the expected relationship between residuals, Y, and ; 2) to determine whether Y or should be used for the assessment of bias; and 3) to reassess the extent of mean and linear bias in the prediction of N flows to the duodenum by the NRC (2001). In the simplest case, we can assume a true model of the form Y = Xß + . This model is estimated by Y = Xb + e, and = Xb. The correlation between the residual vector e and the vector of observations Y can easily be derived. The numerator of the correlation coefficient is shown to be equal to e'e, the residual sum of squares. The denominator of this correlation is equal to the square root of e'e multiplied by the total sum of squares. Algebraic simplifications show that the correlation between e and Y is equal to the square root of (1-R²). That is, under the assumption of an unbiased model, the residuals are correlated with the observed values and the slope of e regressed on Y is equal to (1-R²). Thus, a graph of e versus Y will show a positive slope between e and Y unless the model is a perfect predictor (i.e., R² is equal to 1.0). Significant slopes linking e to Y have been erroneously interpreted as evidence of biased models in the NRC (2001). Conversely, the slope of e regressed on is expected to be zero under the assumption of an unbiased model. Therefore, residuals should be regressed against and not Y. When , as opposed to Y, was used to assess biases in the prediction of flows to the duodenum of microbial N, nonammonia-nonmicrobial N and nonammonia N in NRC (2001), mean biases became nonsignificant and linear biases over the range of predicted values are of the same magnitude or smaller than the standard errors of measurements reported in literature. Thus, although N flow predictions from NRC (2001) may not be precise, they appear to have insignificant and inconsequential biases.

Key Words: prediction bias • model evaluation • National Research Council • accuracy

Abbreviation key: MN = microbial nitrogen, MSS = model sum of squares, NANMN = nonammonia-nonmicrobial nitrogen, RSS = residual sum of squares, TSS = total sum of squares

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Kebreab, K. A. Johnson, S. L. Archibeque, D. Pape, and T. Wirth Model for estimating enteric methane emissions from United States dairy and feedlot cattle J Anim Sci, October 1, 2008; 86(10): 2738 - 2748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Boston and P. J. Moate A novel minimal model to describe NEFA kinetics following an intravenous glucose challenge Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): R1140 - R1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. J. van Vliet, J. W. Reijs, J. Bloem, J. Dijkstra, and R. G. M. de Goede Effects of Cow Diet on the Microbial Community and Organic Matter and Nitrogen Content of Feces J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5146 - 5158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. R. Karnati, J. T. Sylvester, S. M. Noftsger, Z. Yu, N. R. St-Pierre, and J. L. Firkins Assessment of Ruminal Bacterial Populations and Protozoal Generation Time in Cows Fed Different Methionine Sources J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 798 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Seo, C. Lanzas, L. O. Tedeschi, and D. G. Fox Development of a Mechanistic Model to Represent the Dynamics of Liquid Flow Out of the Rumen and to Predict the Rate of Passage of Liquid in Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 840 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Vlaeminck, V. Fievez, S. Tamminga, R. J. Dewhurst, A. van Vuuren, D. De Brabander, and D. Demeyer Milk odd- and branched-chain Fatty acids in relation to the rumen fermentation pattern. J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2006; 89(10): 3954 - 3964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Moate, R. C. Boston, I. J. Lean, and W. Chalupa Short communication: further validation of the fat sub-model in the cornell-penn-miner dairy model. J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(3): 1052 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Firkins, A. N. Hristov, M. B. Hall, G. A. Varga, and N. R. St-Pierre Integration of Ruminal Metabolism in Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(e_suppl_1): E31 - E51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. D. Nennich, J. H. Harrison, L. M. VanWieringen, N. R. St-Pierre, R. L. Kincaid, M. A. Wattiaux, D. L. Davidson, and E. Block Prediction and Evaluation of Urine and Urinary Nitrogen and Mineral Excretion from Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 353 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. Schinckel Critique of "Evaluation of procedures to predict fat-free lean in swine carcasses" J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2719 - 2720. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. D. Nennich, J. H. Harrison, L. M. VanWieringen, D. Meyer, A. J. Heinrichs, W. P. Weiss, N. R. St-Pierre, R. L. Kincaid, D. L. Davidson, and E. Block Prediction of Manure and Nutrient Excretion from Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2005; 88(10): 3721 - 3733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. Hristov, W. J. Price, and B. Shafii A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Intake of Nutrients and Body Weight with Milk Volume and Milk Protein Yield in Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2005; 88(8): 2860 - 2869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. G. Bateman II, J. H. Clark, and M. R. Murphy Development of a System to Predict Feed Protein Flow to the Small Intestine of Cattle J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2005; 88(1): 282 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. P. Weiss and D. J. Wyatt Macromineral Digestion by Lactating Dairy Cows: Estimating Phosphorus Excretion via Manure J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(7): 2158 - 2166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. Hristov, W. J. Price, and B. Shafii A Meta-Analysis Examining the Relationship Among Dietary Factors, Dry Matter Intake, and Milk and Milk Protein Yield in Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(7): 2184 - 2196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]