JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuentes-Pila, J.
Right arrow Articles by Beede, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuentes-Pila, J.
Right arrow Articles by Beede, D. K.
J. Dairy Sci. 86:309-323
© American Dairy Science Association, 2003.

Predicting Average Feed Intake of Lactating Holstein Cows Fed Totally Mixed Rations

J. Fuentes-Pila*, M. Ibañez*, J. M. De Miguel* and D. K. Beede{dagger}

* Department of Statistics and Management Sciences in Agriculture Polytechnic University of Madrid Ciudad Universitaria s/n, Madrid 28040, Spain
{dagger} Department of Animal Science Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824

Corresponding author:
J. Fuente-Pila; e-mail:
jfuentes{at}agricolas.upm.es.

A dry matter intake (DMI) prediction equation was estimated by using a data file that contained 124 treatment means collected from published studies. Animal factors considered for inclusion in the prediction model were body weight (BW) and its natural logarithm, BW0.75, milk yield (MY) and its natural logarithm, milk fat and protein yields, month of lactation and its square, as well as its natural logarithm. The dietary factors considered were the percentages of neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, crude protein and hemicellulose in the ration dry matter together with the square of all these predictors. The multiple regression model selected by using the maximum R2 method include both animal and dietary factors as independent variables. The accuracy of this DMI prediction equation was evaluated and compared with that of five other equations previously published by using three independent datasets also containing treatment means collected from literature. Even though the latest NRC equation was slightly more accurate than the equation proposed in this study with the three evaluation datasets, the latter can be used for some applications for which the NRC equation is not appropriate.

Key Words: feed intake • intake model • prediction equation • Holstein

Abbreviation key: FY = milk fat yield, MOL = month of lactation, MSPE = mean square prediction error, MY = milk yield, PY = milk protein percentage, RADF = ration acid detergent fiber percentage, RCP = ration crude protein percentage, RHEMI = ration hemicellulose percentage, RNDF = ration neutral detergent fiber percentage, RPE = relative prediction error




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. A. Shah and M. R. Murphy
Development and Evaluation of Models to Predict the Feed Intake of Dairy Cows in Early Lactation
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 294 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. N. Hristov, W. J. Price, and B. Shafii
A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Intake of Nutrients and Body Weight with Milk Volume and Milk Protein Yield in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2005; 88(8): 2860 - 2869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.