HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stella, A. Articles by Jansen, G. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stella, A. Articles by Jansen, G. B.

Strategies for Continual Application of Marker-Assisted Selection in an Open Nucleus Population

Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1

Corresponding author:
A. Stella; e-mail:
stella{at}itba.mi.cnr.it.

The objectives of this study were to develop and simulate the implementation of several strategies for repeated application of quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection and marker-assisted selection (MAS) and to compare the short-term and continual genetic responses. A finite locus model was simulated with 20 QTL randomly distributed across 30 chromosome. Three hundred markers were evenly spaced across the genome. Allelic effects were sampled from a double exponential distribution. A daughter design was used every generation to determine the marker alleles favorably associated to QTL alleles. The MAS was applied within family to young bulls, before progeny testing, as part of an open nucleus. Young bulls were selected using strategies based on 1) the single marker with greatest contrast (BEST1), 2) the sum of n greatest contrasts (BESTn), 3) the best n contrasts, limited to one per chromosome (LIMn), 4) the sum of all contrasts exceeding a given threshold n (THRESn), and 5) the sum of contrasts exceeding a threshold, but limited to one per chromosome (LIMT). The maximum progress was achieved by strategies that selected upon several markers flanking multiple QTL in each generation. When THRES was applied, the mean true breeding value (TBV) of selected bulls was increased by 11.98% (over conventional selection) versus 6.73% for BEST1 in the first generation. Applying a full genome scan in each generation allowed selection for different QTL across time. By selecting for multiple QTL over time, MAS maintained superiority over conventional selection for many generations.

Abbreviation key: BESTn = MAS based on the n markers with the greatest contrasts, GEN5 = five generations, LIMn = MAS based on the best markers on n chromosomes, LIMT = LIMn but using only markers that exceed a threshold, MAS = marker-assisted selection, NEW = new unrelated base population, SINGLE = single daughter design, TBV = true breeding value, THRES = MAS based on all markers that exceed a given threshold

Key Words: quantitative trait loci • marker-assisted selection • genetic response

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Duangjinda, D. Buayai, V. Pattarajinda, Y. Phasuk, S. Katawatin, T. Vongpralub, and A. Chaiyotvittayakul Detection of bovine leukocyte antigen DRB3 alleles as candidate markers for clinical mastitis resistance in Holstein x Zebu J Anim Sci, February 1, 2009; 87(2): 469 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ansari-Mahyari, A. C. Sorensen, M. S. Lund, H. Thomsen, and P. Berg Across-Family Marker-Assisted Selection Using Selective Genotyping Strategies in Dairy Cattle Breeding Schemes J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2008; 91(4): 1628 - 1639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]