| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Department of Animal Sciences University of Kentucky 40546-0215
Corresponding author:
A. J. McAllister; e-mail:
amcallis{at}uky.edu.
The current interest in crossbreeding in the commercial dairy industry, even though it is quite limited, raises questions of breed utilization. Fewer than 5% of US dairy cattle are other than purebred or grade Holsteins. The large advantage of Holsteins for additive genetic merit for lactation milk yield is apparently responsible for this trend. Why, then, this interest in crossbreeding? The economic importance of traits such as reproduction, health, and survival in dairy production systems is likely the basis for the interest in crossbreeding, even though these traits are secondary to milk yield. Several US studies and a Canadian study confirmed that while several crossbred groups were equivalent to Holsteins for lactation milk yield, none were superior. Two crossbred groups in the Canadian study had lifetime yields, milk value, and net returns equivalent to Holsteins. In the New Zealand study, Friesian-Jersey reciprocal crossbreds were predicted to exceed Friesians in first-lactation fat yield. Crossbred performance is dictated by a combination of additive and nonadditive genetic effects. Evidence exists for direct, maternal, heterosis, and cytoplasmic maternal effects. Heterosis of 15 to 20% for lifetime traits was found in two studies. Results from previous crossbreeding studies have something to recommend for inclusion of Holstein, Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, and Jersey breeds in a crossbreeding scheme. However, multiple-generation lifetime performance on an array of purebreds and crossbreds under US condition does not exist. Full unique identification of individual animals, including breed composition, would permit the use of DHIA data to estimate additive and nonadditive genetic parameters for the traits recorded therein. Survival data from birth and health data would need to be fully recorded to provide complete data on lifetime performance. Self-propagation of crossbred replacements is mandatory if any crossbreeding system is to be successful. Based on current empirical data, a two-breed rotational crossing system appears to be the most viable system to maximize economic merit. The theoretical advantages of a three-breed rotational crossing system are clear, but the data to recommend the third breed and this system in practice are limited. Full-scale long-term breeding experiments or analysis of field data paired with a comprehensive modeling of alternative breed utilization strategies for US conditions are recommended.
Abbreviation key: ADNR = annualized discounted net returns
Key Words: crossbreeding • dairy breed utilization
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. Begley, F. Buckley, E. B. Burnside, L. Schaeffer, K. Pierce, and B. A. Mallard Immune responses of Holstein and Norwegian Red x Holstein calves on Canadian dairy farms J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2009; 92(2): 518 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Heins, L. B. Hansen, A. J. Seykora, D. G. Johnson, J. G. Linn, J. E. Romano, and A. R. Hazel Crossbreds of Jersey x Holstein Compared with Pure Holsteins for Production, Fertility, and Body and Udder Measurements During First Lactation J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2008; 91(3): 1270 - 1278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. D. Dechow, G. W. Rogers, J. B. Cooper, M. I. Phelps, and A. L. Mosholder Milk, Fat, Protein, Somatic Cell Score, and Days Open Among Holstein, Brown Swiss, and Their Crosses J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3542 - 3549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. VanRaden, M. E. Tooker, J. B. Cole, G. R. Wiggans, and J. H. Megonigal Jr. Genetic Evaluations for Mixed-Breed Populations J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2434 - 2441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Bryant, N. Lopez-Villalobos, J. E. Pryce, C. W. Holmes, D. L. Johnson, and D. J. Garrick Short Communication: Effect of Environment on the Expression of Breed and Heterosis Effects for Production Traits J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2007; 90(3): 1548 - 1553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Maltecca, H. Khatib, V. R. Schutzkus, P. C. Hoffman, and K. A. Weigel Changes in conception rate, calving performance, and calf health and survival from the use of crossbred Jersey x Holstein sires as mates for Holstein dams. J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2747 - 2754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. J. Heins, L. B. Hansen, and A. J. Seykora Production of pure Holsteins versus crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red. J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2799 - 2804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. Weigel and K. A. Barlass Results of a Producer Survey Regarding Crossbreeding on US Dairy Farms J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2003; 86(12): 4148 - 4154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. R. Jordan Effects of Heat Stress on Reproduction J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2003; 86(13_suppl): E104 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
