HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gloy, B. A. Articles by Knoblauch, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gloy, B. A. Articles by Knoblauch, W.

Profitability of Grazing Versus Mechanical Forage Harvesting on New York Dairy Farms

Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853

Corresponding author:
B. A. Gloy; e-mail:
BG49{at}cornell.edu.

The profitability of rotational grazing versus mechanical harvesting of forages was estimated using data from 237 nongrazing and 57 grazing farms participating in the New York farm business summary program in the year 2000. The objective was to perform an empirical comparison of the profitability of grazing versus mechanical forage harvesting systems. A regression analysis technique that controls for treatment selection bias is used to determine the impact of grazing on the rate of return on assets. This is accomplished by joint maximum likelihood estimation of a probit adoption function and a profit function. The results indicate that treatment selection does not have an important impact on the estimate of the profitability of grazing. There were wide ranges and overlap of profitability among herds using the two systems. However, other things equal, farmers utilizing grazing systems were at least if not more profitable than farmers not using grazing systems. After controlling for the factors influencing the decision to graze, we found that herd size, rate of milk production per cow, and prices received for milk have a strong positive impact on profitability. Farmers who perceive potential lifestyle benefits that might be obtained by implementing a grazing system likely do not have to pay an income penalty for adopting a grazing system.

Abbreviation key: OLS = ordinary least squares, , ROA = rate of return on assets

Key Words: grazing • profitability • farm management

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. P. Russelle, M. H. Entz, and A. J. Franzluebbers Reconsidering Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in North America Agron. J., February 6, 2007; 99(2): 325 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]