JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 85 No. 9 2192-2196
© 2002 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Godden, S.
Right arrow Articles by LaValle, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Godden, S.
Right arrow Articles by LaValle, M.

Field Validation of a Milk-line Sampling Device for Monitoring Milk Component Data

S. Godden*, R. Bey{dagger}, J. Reneau{ddagger}, R. Farnsworth* and M. LaValle{dagger}

* Department of Clinical and Population Medicine,
{dagger} Department of Pathobiology, and
{ddagger} Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108

Corresponding author:
S. Godden;
e-mail: godde002{at}tc.umn.edu.

The objective of this study was to investigate the ability of a milk-line sampling device to obtain a representative sample under field conditions by comparing the milk component composition between milk-line and bulk-tank samples, for milk harvested from the same group of cows at the same milking. A total of 42 paired milk-line and bulk-tank samples were collected at separate milking events from 21 different dairy herds. Samples were analyzed for milk fat (%), true protein (%), and milk urea nitrogen (mg/dl). Concordance correlation coefficients showed a very high level of agreement between the two sample types, with values ranging between 0.82 and 0.95 for the components measured. ANOVA showed that milk component data derived from milk-line samples were neither statistically nor numerically different from milk component data derived from bulk-tank samples. The strategy of monitoring milk component data through milk line sampling should provide dairy producers with inexpensive, timely, and accurate information that will help to improve ongoing nutritional monitoring programs for individual groups of cows within the dairy herd.

Abbreviation key: MUN = milk urea nitrogen

Key Words: milk-line sampling • milk fat • true protein • milk urea nitrogen




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. A. Wattiaux, E. V. Nordheim, and P. Crump
Statistical Evaluation of Factors and Interactions Affecting Dairy Herd Improvement Milk Urea Nitrogen in Commercial Midwest Dairy Herds
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2005; 88(8): 3020 - 3035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
N. I. Nielsen, N. C. Friggens, M. G. G. Chagunda, and K. L. Ingvartsen
Predicting Risk of Ketosis in Dairy Cows Using In-Line Measurements of {beta}-Hydroxybutyrate: A Biological Model
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2005; 88(7): 2441 - 2453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.