JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 85 No. 7 1801-1803
© 2002 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kononoff, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Heinrichs, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kononoff, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Heinrichs, A. J.

Technical Note—A Comparison of Methods Used to Measure Eating and Ruminating Activity in Confined Dairy Cattle

P. J. Kononoff, H. A. Lehman and A. J. Heinrichs1

Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, 324 Henning Building, University Park, PA 16802

Corresponding author:
A. J. Heinrichs; e-mail:
ajhs{at}psu.edu.

Detailed knowledge of chewing and rumination activities is critical to fully understand the dietary factors affecting normal rumen function. An automatic system for the digital recording of the jaw movements in free-ranging grazing cattle has been described, but its ability to measure chewing activity of cattle housed in confinement and fed total mixed rations has not yet been evaluated. The eating and ruminating behaviors of eight lactating dairy cows were recorded simultaneously by a wireless automatic system and by 5-min interval observation over 24-h periods. Results indicated that both methods agreed on identification of eating and ruminating bouts. Mean differences between methods for total time eating (8.7 min ± 12.8) and ruminating (42.9 min ± 12.0) were significantly different. The time recorded by observation in both eating and rumination was 3.6 and 10.3% higher compared with the automatic system. Differences indicate inaccuracies in the observational method itself. The automatic system may prove useful in further studies examining eating and rumination activities in cattle.

Key Words: eating • ruminating • automatic recording • Graze software




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. J. Kononoff, A. J. Heinrichs, and H. A. Lehman
The Effect of Corn Silage Particle Size on Eating Behavior, Chewing Activities, and Rumen Fermentation in Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2003; 86(10): 3343 - 3353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.