JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 85 No. 4 968-975
© 2002 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaffrezic, F.
Right arrow Articles by Visscher, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jaffrezic, F.
Right arrow Articles by Visscher, P. M.

Contrasting Models for Lactation Curve Analysis

F. Jaffrezic 1, I. M. S. White 2, R. Thompson 3, and P. M. Visscher 2

1 Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Rd., Edinburgh EH9 3JT INRA-SGQA, Jouy-en-Josas 78352, France
2 Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Rd., Edinburgh EH9 3JT
3 Rothamsted Experimental Station, IACR, Harpenden, Herts AL5 2JQ, UK and Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK

Several statistical models have been proposed for the genetic evaluation of production traits in dairy cattle based on test-day records. Three main approaches have been put forward in the literature: random regression, orthogonal polynomials, and, more recently, character process models. The aim of this paper is to show how these different approaches are related, to compare their performance for the genetic analysis of lactation curves, and to assess equivalence between sire and animal models for repeated measures analyses. It was found that, with an animal model, a character process model with 11 parameters performed better, regarding the likelihood criterion, than a quartic random regression model (with 31 parameters). However, although the likelihood was higher, the genetic variance was very different with the character process model from the unstructured model, which raises important issues concerning model selection criteria. There are advantages in combining methodologies. A quadratic random regression model for the environmental part, combined with a character process model for the residual, performed better than the quartic random regression model and had fewer parameters. A character process structure allowing for a correlation pattern modeled the residual better than a simple quadratic variance, and had only one extra parameter.

Key Words: lactation curve • random regression • orthogonal polynomials • character process models

Submitted on September 18, 2000
Accepted on October 25, 2001




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Wall, M. P. Coffey, and S. Brotherstone
Body Trait Profiles in Holstein-Friesians Modeled Using Random Regression
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2005; 88(10): 3663 - 3671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.