HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tozer, P. R. Articles by Stokes, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tozer, P. R. Articles by Stokes, J. R.

Producer Breeding Objectives and Optimal Sire Selection

P. R. Tozer^* and J. R. Stokes

^* Department of Dairy and Animal Science and
Department of Agricultural Economics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802

Corresponding author: P. Tozer; e-mail: ptozer{at}psu.edu.

Information from an online survey of dairy producers was used to determine how important producers perceived three different objectives in the breeding problem. The objectives were: maximizing expected net merit of the progeny, minimizing the expected progeny inbreeding coefficient, and minimizing semen expenditure. Producers were asked to rank the three objectives and then to weight the importance of each objective relative to the others. This information was then used to determine weights to be used in a multiple-objective integer program designed to select individual mates for a herd of 76 Jersey cows with known genetic background and cow net merit. The results of the multiple-objective models show that rank and relative importance of producer objectives can affect the portfolio of sires selected. Producers whose primary objective was to maximize expected net merit had a range of average expected progeny net merit of $306 to $310, but the level of expected progeny inbreeding was from 6.99 to 10.45%, with a semen cost per conception of $35 to $41. For producers who selected minimizing progeny inbreeding as the primary goal in their breeding programs, the range of inbreeding was from 6.11 to 6.60%, with lower net merit range of $274 to $301 and semen expenditure of $30 to $37 per conception. One producer selected minimizing semen cost as the primary objective. For that producer’s portfolio, the semen cost was $27 per conception and net merit was $288, with a progeny inbreeding coefficient of 10.68%. The results of this research suggest that producer information and goals have a substantial impact on the portfolio of sires selected by that producer to attain these goals.

Key Words: Individual mate selection • multiple-objective integer programming • producer objectives

Abbreviation key: AHP = Analytic hierarchy process, EPIC = expected progeny inbreeding coefficient, EPNM = expected progeny net merit, MOP = multiple-objective programming, NM = net merit

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. B. McConnel and D. T. Galligan The Use of Integer Programming to Select Bulls Across Breeding Companies with Volume Price Discounts J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2004; 87(10): 3542 - 3549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]