HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cassell, B. G. Articles by Pearson, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cassell, B. G. Articles by Pearson, R. E.

Evaluating Sire Selection Practices Using Lifetime Net Income Functions

Department of Dairy Science Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg 24061-0315

Corresponding author:
B. G. Cassell; e-mail:
bcassell{at}vt.edu.

Dairy farmers do not take full advantage of opportunities available for genetic improvement through use of artificial insemination, perhaps because economic advantages of good sire selection may not be fully recognized or understood. This study was undertaken to document differences between use of AI and non-AI bulls and to develop prediction equations to compare lifetime economic merit of future progeny from alternative sire selection policies. We describe the use of two methods of measuring lifetime economic merit, with and without adjustment for opportunity cost of a postponed replacement. Comparison of lifetime relative net income adjusted for opportunity cost on groups of cows sired by different kinds of bulls showed that daughters of proven AI bulls generated $148 and $120 more lifetime net income under fluid and manufactured milk market conditions than daughters of non-AI bulls. Daughters of proven AI bulls produced $60 more than daughters of AI young sires in progeny testing programs at the time of daughter conception. We developed prediction equations from combinations of genetic evaluations for production, productive life, SCS, and linear type traits on sires to predict lifetime relative net income of progeny produced from alternative sire selection strategies. Prediction equations explained 14 to 18% of variation in relative net income (not adjusted for opportunity cost), but herd and year of first freshening accounted for considerably more variation than did genetic evaluations on the sire of the cow. Finally, two independent data sets were used to develop and test predictions of lifetime relative net income adjusted for opportunity cost using genetic evaluations based on the eight traits included in the Merit indexes for the sire of each cow. Prediction equations from odd numbered herds were used to predict lifetime economic merit in even numbered herds and vice versa. Coefficients of determination ranged from 0.088 to 0.103 and averaged 0.004 higher than prediction equations with Net or Fluid Merit. Accuracy of predictions showed that Net and Fluid Merit were robust and useful indexes that accurately identified bulls whose daughters generated highest lifetime economic merit.

Abbreviation key: DPL = days of productive life, HYS = herd-year-season, OC = opportunity cost, PL = productive life, RNI = relative net income, RNIOCF = RNI adjusted for opportunity cost in a fluid milk market, RNIOCM = RNI adjusted for opportunity cost in a manufactured milk market

Key Words: lifetime profit • Net Merit • sire evaluations

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. McDougall and C. Compton Reproductive Performance of Anestrous Dairy Cows Treated with Progesterone and Estradiol Benzoate J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2005; 88(7): 2388 - 2400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. de Vries, C. Steenholdt, and C. A. Risco Pregnancy Rates and Milk Production in Natural Service and Artificially Inseminated Dairy Herds in Florida and Georgia J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 948 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]