JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 85 No. 12 3420-3429
© 2002 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Shelford, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Shelford, J. A.

The Proportion of the Diet to which Fibrolytic Enzymes are Added Affects Nutrient Digestion by Lactating Dairy Cows1

G. R. Bowman*, K. A. Beauchemin{dagger} and J. A. Shelford*,2

* Faculty of Agricultural Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4
{dagger} Sustainable Production Systems, Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1

Corresponding Author:
K. A. Beauchemin; e-mail:
beauchemin{at}agr.gc.ca.

Eight lactating Holstein cows, four with ruminal cannulas, were used in a duplicated 4 x 4 Latin square design to investigate a fibrolytic enzyme product characterized by xylanase and cellulase activities (Promote N.E.T. Agribrands International, St. Louis, MO). The diet consisted of concentrate containing rolled barley and supplement, barley silage and alfalfa haylage (55% to 45% DM basis, forage to concentrate ratio) and differed in enzyme application: 1) control, 2) enzyme applied to concentrate (45% of TMR), 3) enzyme applied to supplement (4% of TMR), and 4) enzyme applied to premix (0.2% of TMR). All diets that were supplemented with the enzyme product delivered about 1.0 grams per cow per day. Digestibility of OM, NDF and ADF in the total tract was increased in comparison to the control when enzymes were added to the entire concentrate. Enzyme treatments that were applied to a smaller portion of the diet showed only numerical increases in digestibility over the control. However, there was an increase in microbial N synthesis for cows fed enzymes added to the premix. The effects of enzyme supplementation on milk production and composition were not statistically significant, but cows receiving the enzyme product added to the concentrate had a numerically higher FCM compared to the control cows. These results indicate that enzyme supplementation increases total tract digestibility of organic matter and fiber. The proportion of the diet to which the enzyme is applied must be maximized to ensure a beneficial response.

Abbreviation key: CMC = carboxymethyl cellulose, CONC = enzyme product added to concentrate (45% of TMR DM basis), CTRL = control treatment, DDMI = digestible dry matter intake, PD = urinary purine derivative, PREM = enzyme product added to premix (0.2% of TMR DM basis), SUPP = enzyme product added to supplement (4% of TMR DM basis)

Key Words: dairy cows • enzymes • digestibility • application method




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. M. Klingerman, W. Hu, E. E. McDonell, M. C. DerBedrosian, and L. Kung Jr.
An evaluation of exogenous enzymes with amylolytic activity for dairy cows
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2009; 92(3): 1050 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
N. A. Krueger, A. T. Adesogan, C. R. Staples, W. K. Krueger, S. C. Kim, R. C. Littell, and L. E. Sollenberger
Effect of method of applying fibrolytic enzymes or ammonia to Bermudagrass hay on feed intake, digestion, and growth of beef steers
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(4): 882 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. A. Elwakeel, E. C. Titgemeyer, B. J. Johnson, C. K. Armendariz, and J. E. Shirley
Fibrolytic Enzymes to Increase the Nutritive Value of Dairy Feedstuffs
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2007; 90(11): 5226 - 5236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J.-S. Eun and K. A. Beauchemin
Enhancing In Vitro Degradation of Alfalfa Hay and Corn Silage Using Feed Enzymes
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2007; 90(6): 2839 - 2851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. P. McNamara and F. Valdez
Adipose Tissue Metabolism and Production Responses to Calcium Propionate and Chromium Propionate
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2005; 88(7): 2498 - 2507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J.-S. Eun and K. A. Beauchemin
Effects of a Proteolytic Feed Enzyme on Intake, Digestion, Ruminal Fermentation, and Milk Production
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2005; 88(6): 2140 - 2153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. B. Dean, A. T. Adesogan, N. Krueger, and R. C. Littell
Effect of Fibrolytic Enzymes on the Fermentation Characteristics, Aerobic Stability, and Digestibility of Bermudagrass Silage
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 994 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. R. Bowman, K. A. Beauchemin, and J. A. Shelford
Fibrolytic Enzymes and Parity Effects on Feeding Behavior, Salivation, and Ruminal pH of Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2003; 86(2): 565 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.