|
|
||||||||

* Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, UK
Corresponding author:
M. P. Coffey; e-mail:
m.coffey{at}ed.sac.ac.uk.
Daily animal solutions were predicted using random regression analysis for feed intake, milk yield, live weight, and condition score recorded on 189 cows at the Langhill Dairy Cattle Research Centre. All cows had three successive lactations. Energy balance for days 1 to 305 of each of the three lactations was calculated both from daily measures of feed intake and milk output and from weekly measures of live weight and condition score. Cows returned to positive energy balance at days 72, 75, and 95 in lactations 1, 2, and 3, respectively, based on energy balance calculated from feed intake and milk output records (EB1), and at days 77, 83, and 73 based on energy balance calculated from body energy state changes (EB2). Correlations between energy balance at the same time in successive lactations ranged from 0.01 to 0.66 depending on the method of calculation and the stage of lactation.
Energy balance over three lactations was modelled using sinusoidal functions which were associated with individual cows and allowed to vary between cows. The parameters of these curves are potentially useful since they have a biological interpretation. The phase relates to the period from calving to return to positive energy balance, and the amplitude relates to the degree of body energy loss (and recovery). The sinusoidal functions fitted to the curve removed a significant proportion of the variation, but accounted for only 45% and 40% of the variation in EB1 and EB2, respectively.
The relationship between energy balance in the first three lactations is likely to be more complex than a simple linear function, but the profile of energy balance over the first three lactations may be a useful selection criteria in a multi-trait index. Energy balance profile over lactations one to three can be modelled with moderate accuracy using sinusoidal functions, and this warrants further research.
Abbreviation key: CS = condition score, EB1 = energy balance calculated from feed intake and milk production records, EB2 = energy balance calculated from body energy state changes, FI = feed intake, LWT = live weight, MY = Milk yield
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Kramer, E. Stamer, J. Spilke, G. Thaller, and J. Krieter Analysis of water intake and dry matter intake using different lactation curve models J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 4072 - 4081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Bewley and M. M. Schutz Review: An Interdisciplinary Review of Body Condition Scoring for Dairy Cattle Professional Animal Scientist, December 1, 2008; 24(6): 507 - 529. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Berry, B. Horan, M. O'Donovan, F. Buckley, E. Kennedy, M. McEvoy, and P. Dillon Genetics of Grass Dry Matter Intake, Energy Balance, and Digestibility in Grazing Irish Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2007; 90(10): 4835 - 4845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Roche, D. P. Berry, J. M. Lee, K. A. Macdonald, and R. C. Boston Describing the Body Condition Score Change Between Successive Calvings: A Novel Strategy Generalizable to Diverse Cohorts J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4378 - 4396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Banos, M. P. Coffey, E. Wall, and S. Brotherstone Genetic relationship between first-lactation body energy and later-life udder health in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2006; 89(6): 2222 - 2232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Coffey, J. Hickey, and S. Brotherstone Genetic Aspects of Growth of Holstein-Friesian Dairy Cows from Birth to Maturity J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 322 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Wall, M. P. Coffey, and S. Brotherstone Body Trait Profiles in Holstein-Friesians Modeled Using Random Regression J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2005; 88(10): 3663 - 3671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Banos, S. Brotherstone, and M. P. Coffey Genetic Profile of Total Body Energy Content of Holstein Cows in the First Three Lactations J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2005; 88(7): 2616 - 2623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Banos, M. P. Coffey, and S. Brotherstone Modeling Daily Energy Balance of Dairy Cows in the First Three Lactations J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2005; 88(6): 2226 - 2237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Coffey, G. Simm, J. D. Oldham, W. G. Hill, and S. Brotherstone Genotype and Diet Effects on Energy Balance in the First Three Lactations of Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2004; 87(12): 4318 - 4326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Banos, S. Brotherstone, and M. P. Coffey Evaluation of Body Condition Score Measured Throughout Lactation as an Indicator of Fertility in Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2004; 87(8): 2669 - 2676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Wall, S. Brotherstone, J. A. Woolliams, G. Banos, and M. P. Coffey Genetic Evaluation of Fertility Using Direct and Correlated Traits J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2003; 86(12): 4093 - 4102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Berry, F. Buckley, P. Dillon, R. D. Evans, M. Rath, and R. F. Veerkamp Genetic Parameters for Body Condition Score, Body Weight, Milk Yield, and Fertility Estimated Using Random Regression Models J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2003; 86(11): 3704 - 3717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Coffey, G. Simm, W. G. Hill, and S. Brotherstone Genetic Evaluations of Dairy Bulls for Daughter Energy Balance Profiles Using Linear Type Scores and Body Condition Score Analyzed Using Random Regression J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2003; 86(6): 2205 - 2212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |