JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 85 No. 10 2662-2668
© 2002 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Firkins, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Eastridge, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Firkins, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Eastridge, M. L.

Lactation Performance by Dairy Cows Fed Wet Brewers Grains or Whole Cottonseed to Replace Forage1,2

J. L. Firkins, D. I. Harvatine3, J. T. Sylvester and M. L. Eastridge

Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, 43210

Corresponding author:
J. L. Firkins; e-mail:
firkins.1{at}osu.edu.

Holstein cows starting at wk 8 of lactation were used to evaluate lactation performance when wet brewers grains, whole linted cottonseed, or starch-coated whole linted cottonseed (EasifloTM) were substituted for forage. The wet brewers grains were added to diets to decrease forage neutral detergent fiber from 21% incrementally down to 15% while simultaneously decreasing nonfiber carbohydrate concentration from 40.3% down to about 33.8%. The cottonseed treatments all had similar concentrations of forage neutral detergent fiber (15%) and nonfiber carbohydrates (33.1 and 36.0%). Dry matter intake and milk production were similar across treatments. Milk fat percentage was decreased for Easiflo versus whole linted cottonseeds, but no other responses were detected. The current National Research Council (NRC) energy model was evaluated using individual cow data that were averaged over the entire 16-wk treatment period. For treatment means, the output of energy averaged 99% of the net energy of lactation intake, indicating very good corroboration of the model to account for energy usage for a group of cows. However, the ability to predict energy usage for individual cows was less accurate based on the comparison of residuals of observed and predicted body weight change regressed against predicted body weight change, apparently because of compounding of random errors in this prediction, which was alleviated over a larger number of observations. These results also corroborate current NRC guidelines for minimum forage neutral detergent fiber concentrations for lactating cows past the calving transition period.

Key Words: forage neutral detergent fiber • nonfiber carbohydrate • wet brewers grain • whole linted cottonseed • dairy cow

Abbreviation key: ECM = energy-corrected milk, NFC = nonfiber carbohydrates, WBG = wet brewers grains, WCS = whole linted cottonseed




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
V. R. Moreira, L. D. Satter, and B. Harding
Comparison of Conventional Linted Cottonseed and Mechanically Delinted Cottonseed in Diets for Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2004; 87(1): 131 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.