JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 85 No. 10 2571-2575
© 2002 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erskine, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Phipps, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erskine, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Phipps, C. R.

Efficacy of Systemic Ceftiofur as a Therapy for Severe Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Cattle

R. J. Erskine, P. C. Bartlett, J. L. VanLente and C. R. Phipps

Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Corresponding author:
R. J. Erskine; e-mail:
erskine{at}cvm.msu.edu.

The objectives of this study were to determine the efficacy of intramuscular administration of ceftiofur to reduce the incidence of case-related death and culling following severe clinical mastitis in lactating dairy cattle. A total of 104 cows with severe clinical mastitis (systemic signs) were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. Immediately after detection of the case, one group was administered 2.2 mg/kg of ceftiofur intramuscularly, and the dose repeated at 24-h intervals for a total of five doses. The second group of cows did not receive systemic antibacterial therapy. Additionally, all cows in both treatment groups received intramammary pirlimycin (Pirsue®) in the affected quarter every 24 h for a total of up to three doses. Also at the onset of the case, all cows on the trial were administered a supportive therapeutic regimen of fluids and anti-inflammatory agents that varied from farm to farm, but was standard within each herd at the discretion of the herd manager and veterinarian. Of all cases 14/104 (13.5%) resulted in a lost cow (died or culled). The proportion of cases that resulted in a lost cow and were treated with ceftiofur (4/51; 7.8%) did not statistically differ from cows that were not treated with ceftiofur (10/53; 18.9%). However, the proportion of cases that resulted in lost cows was higher for those cases that yielded a coliform organism on culture (14/56; 25.0%) than cases that did not yield coliforms (0/48; 0.0%; P < 0.001). Thus, among coliform cases, cows that were not treated with ceftiofur were more likely to be culled or die (10/27, 37.0%; P < 0.05) than cows treated with ceftiofur (4/29, 13.8%). We conclude that intramuscular administration of ceftiofur did not affect the outcome of severe clinical mastitis when all etiologic agents are included in the analysis. However, for severe clinical mastitis cases caused by coliform organisms, ceftiofur therapy reduced the proportion of cases that resulted in cow death or culling. This benefit may be realized because of the amelioration of bacteremic-related pathogenesis.

Key Words: clinical mastitis • ceftiofur • therapy




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. A. Munoz, G. J. Bennett, C. Ahlstrom, H. M. Griffiths, Y. H. Schukken, and R. N. Zadoks
Cleanliness Scores as Indicator of Klebsiella Exposure in Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2008; 91(10): 3908 - 3916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Pol and P. L. Ruegg
Treatment Practices and Quantification of Antimicrobial Drug Usage in Conventional and Organic Dairy Farms in Wisconsin
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 249 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. A. Munoz, C. Ahlstrom, B. J. Rauch, and R. N. Zadoks
Fecal Shedding of Klebsiella pneumoniae by Dairy Cows.
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2006; 89(9): 3425 - 3430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. R. Wenz, F. B. Garry, J. E. Lombard, R. Elia, D. Prentice, and R. P. Dinsmore
Short Communication: Efficacy of Parenteral Ceftiofur for Treatment of Systemically Mild Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2005; 88(10): 3496 - 3499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. F. Rabello, C. R. V. M. Souza, R. S. Duarte, R. M. M. Lopes, L. M. Teixeira, and A. C. D. Castro
Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Recovered from Bovine Mastitis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2005; 88(9): 3211 - 3219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. A. Sawant, L. M. Sordillo, and B. M. Jayarao
A Survey on Antibiotic Usage in Dairy Herds in Pennsylvania
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2005; 88(8): 2991 - 2999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. Lehtolainen, A. Shwimmer, N. Y. Shpigel, T. Honkanen-Buzalski, and S. Pyorala
In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Escherichia coli Isolates from Clinical Bovine Mastitis in Finland and Israel
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2003; 86(12): 3927 - 3932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.