HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schreiner, D. A. Articles by Ruegg, P. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schreiner, D. A. Articles by Ruegg, P. L.

Effects of Tail Docking on Milk Quality and Cow Cleanliness¹

Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, 1675 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706

Corresponding author:
Pamela L. Ruegg; email:
plruegg{at}facstaff.wisc.edu.

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of tail docking on somatic cell count (SCC), intramammary infection (IMI), and udder and leg cleanliness in commercial dairy herds. Lactating dairy cows (n = 1250) from eight Wisconsin farms were blocked by farm and randomly allocated to tail docked (D) or control (C) groups. Milk samples, somatic cell counts, and hygiene scores were collected for 8 to 9 mo. The prevalence of IMI was determined for each of the five occasions when milk samples were obtained. Udder and leg cleanliness were assessed during milk sample collection. Docked and control animals were compared by logSCC, prevalence of IMI, and leg and udder cleanliness score. Variables were analyzed according to all treatment, period, and farm interactions. At the end of the study period 76 (12.2%) and 81 (13%) of cows were culled in the D and C groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in the initial data for parity, daily milk yield, logSCC, or DIM between treatment groups. Effects significant to farms were identified for all variables over all periods. Period was significant for all variables except for the prevalence of environmental pathogens, but no period x treatment interactions were detected. There was no significant difference between treatment groups for somatic cell count. The prevalence of contagious, environmental, or minor pathogens did not differ significantly between treatment groups. This study did not identify any differences in udder or leg hygiene or milk quality that could be attributed to tail docking.

Key Words: mastitis • somatic cell count • hygiene • intramammary infection

Abbreviation key: C = control, D = docked

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Munoz, G. J. Bennett, C. Ahlstrom, H. M. Griffiths, Y. H. Schukken, and R. N. Zadoks Cleanliness Scores as Indicator of Klebsiella Exposure in Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2008; 91(10): 3908 - 3916. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. T. Thomsen, J. T. Sorensen, and A. K. Ersboll Evaluation of Three Commercial Hoof-Care Products Used in Footbaths in Danish Dairy Herds J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2008; 91(4): 1361 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. K. Fulwider, T. Grandin, B. E. Rollin, T. E. Engle, N. L. Dalsted, and W. D. Lamm Survey of Dairy Management Practices on One Hundred Thirteen North Central and Northeastern United States Dairies J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2008; 91(4): 1686 - 1692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. W. R. Compton, C. Heuer, K. Parker, and S. McDougall Risk Factors for Peripartum Mastitis in Pasture-Grazed Dairy Heifers J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2007; 90(9): 4171 - 4180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]