JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 85 No. 10 2479-2488
© 2002 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sodini, I.
Right arrow Articles by Corrieu, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sodini, I.
Right arrow Articles by Corrieu, G.

Effect of Milk Base and Starter Culture on Acidification, Texture, and Probiotic Cell Counts in Fermented Milk Processing

I. Sodini*, A. Lucas*, M. N. Oliveira{dagger}, F. Remeuf* and G. Corrieu*

* Unité Mixte de Recherche de Génie et Microbiologie des Procédés Alimentaires, Institut National Agronomique de Paris Grignon/Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 78 850 Thiverval Grignon, France
{dagger} São Paulo University, Department of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Technology, Av Prof Lineu Prestes, 580, 05508-900, São Paulo, Brazil

Corresponding author:
I. Sodini; e-mail:
Sodini{at}grignon.inra.fr.

In the present work, the compared effect of milk base and starter culture on acidification, texture, growth, and stability of probiotic bacteria in fermented milk processing, was studied. Two strains of probiotic bacteria were used, Lactobacillus acidophilus LA5 and L. rhamnosus LR35, with two starter cultures. One starter culture consisted only of Streptococcus thermophilus ST7 (single starter culture); the other was a yogurt mixed culture with S. thermophilus ST7 and L. bulgaricus LB12 (mixed starter culture). For the milk base preparation, four commercial dairy ingredients were tested (two milk protein concentrates and two casein hydrolysates). The resulting fermented milks were compared to those obtained with control milk (without enrichment) and milk added with skim milk powder. The performance of the two probiotic strains were opposite. L. acidophilus LA5 grew well on milk but showed a poor stability during storage. L. rhamnosus LR35 grew weakly on milk but was remarkably stable during storage. With the strains tested in this study, the use of the single starter culture and the addition of casein hydrolysate gave the best probiotic cell counts. The fermentation time was of about 11 h, and the probiotic level after five weeks of storage was greater than 106 cfu/ml for L. acidophilus LA5 and 107 cfu/ml for L. rhamnosus LR35. However, an optimization of the level of casein hydrolysate added to milk base has to be done, in order to improve texture and flavor when using this dairy ingredient.

Key Words: probiotic bacteria • dairy ingredients • stability • texture

Abbreviation key: MPC = milk protein concentrate, CH = casein hydrolysate, SSC = single starter culture, MSC = mixed starter culture, SMP = skim milk powder




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
S. J. Lahtinen, A. C. Ouwehand, J. P. Reinikainen, J. M. Korpela, J. Sandholm, and S. J. Salminen
Intrinsic properties of so-called dormant probiotic bacteria, determined by flow cytometric viability assays.
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 2006; 72(7): 5132 - 5134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.