JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 85 No. 10 2415-2424
© 2002 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neocleous, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rudan, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neocleous, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rudan, M. A.

Impact of Low Concentration Factor Microfiltration on Milk Component Recovery and Cheddar Cheese Yield1

M. Neocleous, D. M. Barbano and M. A. Rudan2

Northeast Dairy Foods Research Center Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853

Corresponding author:
D. M. Barbano; e-mail:
dmb37{at}cornell.edu.

The effect of microfiltration (MF) on the composition of Cheddar cheese, fat, crude protein (CP), calcium, total solids recovery, and Cheddar cheese yield efficiency (i.e., composition adjusted yield divided by theoretical yield) was determined. Raw skim milk was microfiltered twofold using a 0.1-µm ceramic membrane at 50°C. Four vats of cheese were made in one day using milk at 1x, 1.26x, 1.51x, and 1.82x concentration factor (CF). An appropriate amount of cream was added to achieve a constant casein (CN)-to-fat ratio across treatments. Cheese manufacture was repeated on four different days using a randomized complete block design. The composition of the cheese was affected by MF. Moisture content of the cheese decreased with increasing MF CF. Standardization of milk to a constant CN-to-fat ratio did not eliminate the effect of MF on cheese moisture content. Fat recovery in cheese was not changed by MF. Separation of cream prior to MF, followed by the recombination of skim or MF retentate with cream resulted in lower fat recovery in cheese for control and all treatments and higher fat loss in whey when compared to previous yield experiments, when control Cheddar cheese was made from unseparated milk. Crude protein, calcium, and total solids recovery in cheese increased with increasing MF CF, due to partial removal of these components prior to cheese making. Calcium and calcium as a percentage of protein increased in the cheese, suggesting an increase in calcium retention in the cheese with increasing CF. While the actual and composition adjusted cheese yields increased with increasing MF CF, as expected, there was no effect of MF CF on cheese yield efficiency.

Key Words: Cheddar cheese • microfiltration • concentration factor • yield

Abbreviation key: CF = concentration factor, FDB = fat on a dry basis, HCF = high concentration factor, LCF = low concentration factor, MCF = medium concentration factor, MF = microfiltration, MNFS = moisture in the nonfat substance, PDB = protein on a dry basis, SEF = solute exclusion factor, SM = standardized milk, TN = total nitrogen




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Zulewska, M. Newbold, and D. M. Barbano
Efficiency of serum protein removal from skim milk with ceramic and polymeric membranes at 50{degrees}C
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2009; 92(4): 1361 - 1377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Govindasamy-Lucey, J. J. Jaeggi, M. E. Johnson, T. Wang, and J. A. Lucey
Use of Cold Microfiltration Retentates Produced with Polymeric Membranes for Standardization of Milks for Manufacture of Pizza Cheese
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2007; 90(10): 4552 - 4568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. K. Nelson and D. M. Barbano
Yield and Aging of Cheddar Cheeses Manufactured from Milks with Different Milk Serum Protein Contents
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2005; 88(12): 4183 - 4194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. K. Nelson and D. M. Barbano
A Microfiltration Process to Maximize Removal of Serum Proteins from Skim Milk Before Cheese Making
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2005; 88(5): 1891 - 1900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. K. Nelson, J. M. Lynch, and D. M. Barbano
Impact of Milk Preacidification with CO2 on Cheddar Cheese Composition and Yield
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2004; 87(11): 3581 - 3589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. V. Ardisson-Korat and S. S. H. Rizvi
Vatless Manufacturing of Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese from Highly Concentrated Skim Milk Microfiltration Retentates
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2004; 87(11): 3601 - 3613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
Y. Ma and D. M. Barbano
Serum Protein and Casein Concentration: Effect on pH and Freezing Point of Milk with Added CO2
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2003; 86(5): 1590 - 1600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
M. Neocleous, D. M. Barbano, and M. A. Rudan
Impact of Low Concentration Factor Microfiltration on the Composition and Aging of Cheddar Cheese
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2002; 85(10): 2425 - 2437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.