| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB30ES, England, United Kingdom
2 School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL572UW, Wales, United Kingdom
We examined whether separating dominant and subordinate cows affected production or behavior, and the relationships between dominance and production measures, by using grazing cows, some of which were offered forage supplements. In experiment 1, 80 cows were allocated to either pasture only or pasture and a silage supplement offered indoors overnight. Dominance was principally related to body weight, but was also positively correlated with lactation number and negatively correlated with grazing time. In experiment 2, 72 spring-calving cows were classified as dominant or subordinate, on the basis of aggressive interactions, and were divided by two factors; i.e., dominant and subordinate cows grazed together or apart, and with or without a hay supplement, which was offered indoors for 75 min/d. Dominant cows produced more milk than subordinates, probably because of their faster pasture biting rate and hay chewing rate. The hay-supplemented dominant cows produced more milk when kept apart from subordinates, and both dominant and subordinate cows gained more weight and lay down for longer when kept apart. However, when no hay was offered, dominant cows produced more milk and had a faster pasture biting rate when grazed together with subordinates. Cows high in the dominance order were more likely to enter the parlor first, but not to begin grazing first. The results suggest that production can increase when dominant and subordinate cows that are offered forage in a competitive situation are separated, whereas there is no benefit in separating them if they are at pasture all day.
Key Words: dominance • subordinate • hay supplement • grazing
Submitted on October 20, 2000
Accepted on August 2, 2001
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, J. Rushen, A. M. de Passille, and D. M. Weary Invited review: The welfare of dairy cattle--Key concepts and the role of science J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2009; 92(9): 4101 - 4111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. L. Proudfoot, D. M. Veira, D. M. Weary, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk Competition at the feed bunk changes the feeding, standing, and social behavior of transition dairy cows J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2009; 92(7): 3116 - 3123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Val-Laillet, D. M. Veira, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk Short Communication: Dominance in Free-Stall-Housed Dairy Cattle Is Dependent upon Resource J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2008; 91(10): 3922 - 3926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. E. Speidel, R. M. Enns, and D. J. Garrick Weaning weight inheritance in environments classified by maternal body weight change J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 610 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. J. C. Phillips, S. Llewellyn, and A. Claudia Laterality in Bovine Behavior in an Extensive Partially Suckled Herd and an Intensive Dairy Herd J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2003; 86(10): 3167 - 3173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
