|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Population, Health, and Reproduction, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Facility, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis CA 93274
2 Infectious Diseases Biology, Pharmacia Corporation, Kalamazoo MI 49001
Environmental streptococci are frequently isolated from bovine mastitis in dairy cows with only limited information available on the antimicrobial susceptibility of these organisms. A total of 362 environmental streptococci isolated from cases of bovine mastitis from the central San Joaquin Valley of California over a 3-yr period were used in the study. Overall, 39.9% of the strains tested were Streptococcus uberis, 42.2% were Streptococcus dysgalactiae, and 11.1% were Enterococcus spp. The antimicrobial susceptibility for these organisms was determined for the following antimicrobial agents: penicillin, ampicillin, cephalothin, ceftiofur, penicillin + novobiocin, erythromycin, pirlimycin, tetracycline, and sulfadimethoxine. Results demonstrate substantial differences in the susceptibility patterns for the various organisms collectively referred to as the environmental streptococci. The MIC90 for penicillin was 0.06 µg/ml for 152 strains of S. dysgalactiae compared with 0.25 µg/ml for 133 strains of S. uberis. However, the Enterococcus spp. were the most resistant organisms tested. These data also indicate that the use of interpretive criteria based on human data may provide misleading results. In conclusion, these data confirm that the environmental streptococci are a diverse group of organisms comprised of several different genera and species and that identification of environmental streptococci to the species level is needed to appropriately modify control methods. Moreover, the use of the agar disk diffusion (Kirby-Bauer) susceptibility test for agents with human-based interpretive criteria is contraindicated, and these tests should only be performed with agents with mastitis specific interpretive criteria.
Key Words: bovine mastitis antimicrobial susceptibility streptococci enterococci
Submitted on June 11, 2001
Accepted on September 13, 2001
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Petinaki, V. Guerin-Faublee, V. Pichereau, C. Villers, A. Achard, B. Malbruny, and R. Leclercq Lincomycin Resistance Gene lnu(D) in Streptococcus uberis Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., February 1, 2008; 52(2): 626 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pol and P. L. Ruegg Relationship Between Antimicrobial Drug Usage and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Positive Mastitis Pathogens J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 262 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.-A. Tenhagen, G. Koster, J. Wallmann, and W. Heuwieser Prevalence of mastitis pathogens and their resistance against antimicrobial agents in dairy cows in Brandenburg, Germany. J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2542 - 2551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Roesch, V. Perreten, M. G. Doherr, W. Schaeren, M. Schallibaum, and J. W. Blum Comparison of antibiotic resistance of udder pathogens in dairy cows kept on organic and on conventional farms. J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(3): 989 - 997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Kirk, B. McCowan, E. R. Atwill, K. S. Glenn, G. E. Higginbotham, C. A. Collar, A. Castillo, B. A. Reed, N. G. Peterson, and J. S. Cullor Association of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Cluster Patterns with Dairy Management Practices for Environmental Bacteria Isolated from Bulk Tank Milk J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2005; 88(10): 3710 - 3720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pitkala, V. Gindonis, H. Wallin, and T. Honkanen-Buzalski Interlaboratory Proficiency Testing as a Tool for Improving Performance in Laboratories Diagnosing Bovine Mastitis J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2005; 88(2): 553 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pitkala, M. Haveri, S. Pyorala, V. Myllys, and T. Honkanen-Buzalski Bovine Mastitis in Finland 2001--Prevalence, Distribution of Bacteria, and Antimicrobial Resistance J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2004; 87(8): 2433 - 2441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |