JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 85 No. 1 105-111
© 2002 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Washburn, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Benson, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Washburn, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Benson, G. A.

Reproduction, Mastitis, and Body Condition of Seasonally Calved Holstein and Jersey Cows in Confinement or Pasture Systems

S. P. Washburn 1, S. L. White 1, J. T. Green Jr. 2, and G. A. Benson 3

1 Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695
2 Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695
3 Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695

Dairy cows in confinement and pasture-based feeding systems were compared across four spring-calving and three fall-calving replicates for differences in reproduction, mastitis, body weights, and body condition scores. Feeding systems and replicates included both Jersey and Holstein cows. Cows in confinement were fed a total mixed ration, and cows on pasture were supplemented with concentrates and provided baled hay or haylage when pasture supply was limiting. Breeding periods were for 75 d in spring or fall. Reproductive performance did not differ significantly due to feeding system or season. Jerseys had higher conception rates (59.6 vs. 49.5 ± 3.3%) and higher percentages of cows pregnant in 75 d (78.1 vs. 57.9 ± 3.9%) than Holsteins. Cows in confinement had 1.8 times more clinical mastitis and eight times the rate of culling for mastitis than did cows on pasture. Jerseys had half as many clinical cases of mastitis per cow as Holsteins. Only 41 ± 5% of confinement Holsteins remained for a subsequent lactation, starting within the defined calving season compared with 51 ± 5% of pastured Holsteins and 71 and 72 ± 5% of Jerseys, respectively. Body weights and condition scores were generally higher for confinement cows than pastured cows, and Jerseys had higher condition scores and lower body weights than Holsteins. In summary, pastured cows had fewer clinical cases of mastitis, lower body condition scores, and lower body weights than confinement cows. Holsteins were less likely to rebreed, had more mastitis, higher culling rates, and lower body condition scores than Jerseys.

Key Words: reproduction • mastitis • confinement • pasture

Submitted on June 25, 2001
Accepted on October 1, 2001




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. J. Heins, L. B. Hansen, A. J. Seykora, A. R. Hazel, D. G. Johnson, and J. G. Linn
Crossbreds of Jersey x Holstein Compared with Pure Holsteins for Body Weight, Body Condition Score, Dry Matter Intake, and Feed Efficiency During the First One Hundred Fifty Days of First Lactation
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3716 - 3722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
Y.-H. Chung, M. M. Pickett, T. W. Cassidy, and G. A. Varga
Effects of Prepartum Dietary Carbohydrate Source and Monensin on Periparturient Metabolism and Lactation in Multiparous Cows
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2008; 91(7): 2744 - 2758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. D. Bannerman, A. C. W. Kauf, M. J. Paape, H. R. Springer, and J. P. Goff
Comparison of Holstein and Jersey Innate Immune Responses to Escherichia coli Intramammary Infection
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2008; 91(6): 2225 - 2235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
K. A. Macdonald, G. A. Verkerk, B. S. Thorrold, J. E. Pryce, J. W. Penno, L. R. McNaughton, L. J. Burton, J. A. S. Lancaster, J. H. Williamson, and C. W. Holmes
A Comparison of Three Strains of Holstein-Friesian Grazed on Pasture and Managed Under Different Feed Allowances
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2008; 91(4): 1693 - 1707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. C. Aikman, C. K. Reynolds, and D. E. Beever
Diet Digestibility, Rate of Passage, and Eating and Rumination Behavior of Jersey and Holstein Cows
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2008; 91(3): 1103 - 1114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. J. Heins, L. B. Hansen, A. J. Seykora, D. G. Johnson, J. G. Linn, J. E. Romano, and A. R. Hazel
Crossbreds of Jersey x Holstein Compared with Pure Holsteins for Production, Fertility, and Body and Udder Measurements During First Lactation
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2008; 91(3): 1270 - 1278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Walsh, F. Buckley, D. P. Berry, M. Rath, K. Pierce, N. Byrne, and P. Dillon
Effects of Breed, Feeding System, and Parity on Udder Health and Milking Characteristics
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5767 - 5779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. P. Russelle, M. H. Entz, and A. J. Franzluebbers
Reconsidering Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in North America
Agron. J., February 6, 2007; 99(2): 325 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
D. P. Berry, J. M. Lee, K. A. Macdonald, K. Stafford, L. Matthews, and J. R. Roche
Associations Among Body Condition Score, Body Weight, Somatic Cell Count, and Clinical Mastitis in Seasonally Calving Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 637 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. R. Roche, K. A. Macdonald, C. R. Burke, J. M. Lee, and D. P. Berry
Associations Among Body Condition Score, Body Weight, and Reproductive Performance in Seasonal-Calving Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2007; 90(1): 376 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Hare, H. D. Norman, and J. R. Wright
Survival rates and productive herd life of dairy cattle in the United States.
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2006; 89(9): 3713 - 3720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
U. J. Schroder and R. Staufenbiel
Invited Review: Methods to Determine Body Fat Reserves in the Dairy Cow with Special Regard to Ultrasonographic Measurement of Backfat Thickness
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. M. DeFrain, A. R. Hippen, K. F. Kalscheur, and J. M. Tricarico
Effects of Dietary {alpha}-Amylase on Metabolism and Performance of Transition Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2005; 88(12): 4405 - 4413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. A. Sanderson, K. J. Soder, L. D. Muller, K. D. Klement, R. H. Skinner, and S. C. Goslee
Forage Mixture Productivity and Botanical Composition in Pastures Grazed by Dairy Cattle
Agron. J., September 19, 2005; 97(5): 1465 - 1471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. S. Fontaneli, L. E. Sollenberger, R. C. Littell, and C. R. Staples
Performance of Lactating Dairy Cows Managed on Pasture-Based or in Freestall Barn-Feeding Systems
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 1264 - 1276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. R. Overton and M. R. Waldron
Nutritional Management of Transition Dairy Cows: Strategies to Optimize Metabolic Health
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(13_suppl): E105 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
F. Bargo, L. D. Muller, J. E. Delahoy, and T. W. Cassidy
Performance of High Producing Dairy Cows with Three Different Feeding Systems Combining Pasture and Total Mixed Rations
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2002; 85(11): 2948 - 2963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.