JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 84 No. 6 1407-1412
© 2001 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schrick, F. N.
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schrick, F. N.
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, S. P.

Influence of Subclinical Mastitis During Early Lactation on Reproductive Parameters

F. N. Schrick 1, M. E. Hockett 1, A. M. Saxton 1, M. J. Lewis 1, H. H. Dowlen 1, and S. P. Oliver 1

1 Department of Animal Science, Institute of Agriculture, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996

Our objective was to determine the effects of mastitis during early lactation on the reproductive performance of Jersey cows. From 1986 to 1997, quarter foremilk samples were collected every 4 to 8 wk during lactation, at drying off, near calving, and when clinical mastitis was diagnosed and were evaluated microbiologically to identify causative bacteria. Services per conception, days open, and days to first service were obtained from DHIA records on 752 cows. Cows were separated by mastitis type (clinical, n = 186; subclinical, n = 240; control, uninfected or infected after confirmed pregnancy, n = 326). Cows were reclassified based on the time of clinical or subclinical mastitis as follows: period 1, before first service (n = 374); period 2, between first service and pregnancy (n = 52); and period 3, after confirmed pregnancy or uninfected (control; n = 326). Milk production did not differ for any group separations. Reproductive performance did not differ between gram-negative or gram-positive mastitis pathogens. Cows with clinical or subclinical mastitis before first service had increased days to first service (77.3 ± 2.7 and 74.8 ± 2.7 d), days open (110.0 ± 6.9 and 107.7 ± 6.9 d), and services per conception (2.1 ± 0.2 and 2.1 ± 0.2) compared with controls (67.8 ± 2.2 d, 85.4 ± 5.8 d, 1.6 ± 0.2; P < 0.05). Days to first service were not increased in cows with clinical or subclinical mastitis during period 2 (70.6 ± 3.3 and 61.2 ± 7.8 d). However, days open (143.6 ± 8.5 d) and services per conception (3.0 ± 0.2) were increased (P < 0.05) in cows with clinical mastitis during period 2, but not in cows with subclinical mastitis (90.9 ± 20.2 d and 2.1 ± 0.5). Cows initially diagnosed subclinical that became clinical during period 2 exhibited increased days to first service (93.9 ± 10.1 d), days open (196.0 ± 26.2 d), and services per conception (4.3 ± 0.7) compared with control animals (P < 0.05). In conclusion, subclinical mastitis reduced reproductive performance of lactating cows similar to clinical mastitis. Subclinical mastitis followed by clinical mastitis resulted in the most severe loss in reproductive performance.

Key Words: mastitis • reproduction • dairy cattle

Submitted on July 31, 2000
Accepted on January 2, 2001




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. D. Ferguson, G. Azzaro, M. Gambina, and G. Licitra
Prevalence of Mastitis Pathogens in Ragusa, Sicily, from 2000 to 2006
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2007; 90(12): 5798 - 5813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Konig, F. Bosselmann, U. U. von Borstel, and H. Simianer
Genetic Analysis of Traits Affecting the Success of Embryo Transfer in Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3945 - 3954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
A. A. Borm, L. K. Fox, K. E. Leslie, J. S. Hogan, S. M. Andrew, K. M. Moyes, S. P. Oliver, Y. H. Schukken, D. D. Hancock, C. T. Gaskins, et al.
Effects of prepartum intramammary antibiotic therapy on udder health, milk production, and reproductive performance in dairy heifers.
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2006; 89(6): 2090 - 2098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. M. Swinkels, H. Hogeveen, and R. N. Zadoks
A Partial Budget Model to Estimate Economic Benefits of Lactational Treatment of Subclinical Staphylococcus aureus Mastitis
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2005; 88(12): 4273 - 4287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. De Vliegher, H. W. Barkema, G. Opsomer, A. de Kruif, and L. Duchateau
Association Between Somatic Cell Count in Early Lactation and Culling of Dairy Heifers Using Cox Frailty Models
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2005; 88(2): 560 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. A. Vanegas, J. Reynolds, and E. R. Atwill
Effects of an Injectable Trace Mineral Supplement on First-Service Conception Rate of Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2004; 87(11): 3665 - 3671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. R. Overton and M. R. Waldron
Nutritional Management of Transition Dairy Cows: Strategies to Optimize Metabolic Health
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(13_suppl): E105 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
R. Sartori, J. M. Haughian, R. D. Shaver, G. J. M. Rosa, and M. C. Wiltbank
Comparison of Ovarian Function and Circulating Steroids in Estrous Cycles of Holstein Heifers and Lactating Cows
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2004; 87(4): 905 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
Ch. Kuhn, J. Bennewitz, N. Reinsch, N. Xu, H. Thomsen, C. Looft, G. A. Brockmann, M. Schwerin, C. Weimann, S. Hiendleder, et al.
Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping of Functional Traits in the German Holstein Cattle Population
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2003; 86(1): 360 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.