JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 84 No. 6 1397-1406
© 2001 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Godden, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lumsden, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Godden, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lumsden, J. H.

Milk Urea Testing as a Tool to Monitor Reproductive Performance in Ontario Dairy Herds

S. M. Godden 1, D. F. Kelton 2, K. D. Lissemore 2, J. S. Walton 3, K. E. Leslie 2, and J. H. Lumsden 4

1 Department of Clinical and Population Sciences, University of Minnesota, 225 VTH, 1365 Gortner Ave., St. Paul, MN 55108
2 Department of Population Medicine, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
3 Department of Animal and Poultry Science, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
4 Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1

Dairy herd improvement test-day data, including milk urea concentrations measured using infrared test method, were collected from 60 commercial Ontario Holstein dairy herds for a 13-mo period between December 1, 1995, and December 31, 1996. The objective of the study was to describe, at the cow and the group level, the relationship between DHI milk urea concentrations and reproductive performance in commercial dairy herds.

When interpreted at the cow level, there was no association between milk urea and the risk for pregnancy from an insemination occurring within the 45-d period preceding test day. However, a negative curvilinear relationship existed between milk urea and the risk for pregnancy from a first, second, or third insemination event occurring within the 45-d period following test day, with the odds for pregnancy being highest when the milk urea on the test day preceding the insemination was either below 4.5 mmol/L or greater than 6.49 mmol/L, compared with a concentration between 4.5 and 6.49 mmol/L. When interpreted at the group level, there was no association between group mean milk urea for cows between 50 and 180 DIM, and the group conception rate for cows receiving a first, second, or third insemination event in the 45-d period either preceding or following test day. Thus, while DHI milk urea measurements may be useful as a management tool to improve the efficiency of production or reduce nitrogen excretion, through helping to optimize the efficiency of protein utilization, they may have limited utility as a monitoring or diagnostic tool for reproductive performance. The results of this study suggest that good fertility may be achieved across a broad range of milk urea concentrations.

Key Words: milk urea testing • Ontario • dairy herds

Submitted on September 5, 2000
Accepted on February 8, 2001




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
K. Guo, E. Russek-Cohen, M. A.Varner, and R. A. Kohn
Effects of Milk Urea Nitrogen and Other Factors on Probability of Conception of Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2004; 87(6): 1878 - 1885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
P. J. Rajala-Schultz and W. J. A. Saville
Sources of Variation in Milk Urea Nitrogen in Ohio Dairy Herds
J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2003; 86(5): 1653 - 1661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.