|
|
||||||||
1 Institute of Land and Food Resources, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3052
2 Institute of Land and Food Resources, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3052 and Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Dept. of Natural Resources and Environment, Attwood, Vic 3049, Australia
3 Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Dept. of Natural Resources and Environment, Attwood, Vic 3049, Australia
Genetic parameters for daily somatic cell counts (SCC) of the first three parities were estimated for Australian Dairy Cattle. Most of the data analyses were carried out with a sire random regression model. The estimates were compared with those from conventional ten-trait analyses and animal models. In the first-parity estimates of heritabilities (h2) were low (0.04 to 0.05) at the beginning of the lactation and higher (0.11 to 0.13) at the end. The average h2 estimated from random regression sire model, random regression animal model and conventional multitrait sire model were 0.09, 0.09, and 0.08, respectively, in the first lactation. The average h2 were 0.09 and 0.11 in the second and third parities, respectively. Genetic correlations between daily loge SCC within parity were high for adjacent tests (nearly 1) and low (as low as 0.30) between the beginning and the end of the lactation. Generally, the genetic correlations between parities depend on how far apart they are and on whether they are on the same day in any two parities. Across parities, on average, genetic correlations between parities 1 and 3 were the lowest and those between 1 and 2 intermediate, while those between 2 and 3 were the highest. The estimated environmental correlations were lower than the genetic correlations, but the trends were generally similar. Differences in genetic parameter estimates due to model were small, except for some genetic correlations. The high residual error variances, the low h2, and the inconsistency in genetic correlations that were observed particularly at the beginning of the first lactation suggest that loge SCC early in the first lactation may be related to a spike in SCC as result of infection and (or) onset of lactation while SCC later in lactation represents a sustained response to infection. Accounting for the variation in heritabilities and correlations should improve the accuracy of genetic evaluations for SCC based on test day records.
Key Words: daily somatic cell count random regression genetic parameters
Submitted on July 3, 2000
Accepted on December 30, 2000
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. P. L. Calus, L. L. G. Janss, and R. F. Veerkamp Genotype by Environment Interaction for Somatic Cell Score Across Bulk Milk Somatic Cell Count and Days in Milk J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4846 - 4857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Odegard, G. Klemetsdal, and B. Heringstad Genetic Improvement in Mastitis Resistance: Comparison of Selection Criteria from Cross-Sectional and Random Regression Sire Models for Somatic Cell Score J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2005; 88(4): 1515 - 1520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Carlen, E. Strandberg, and A. Roth Genetic Parameters for Clinical Mastitis, Somatic Cell Score, and Production in the First Three Lactations of Swedish Holstein Cows J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2004; 87(9): 3062 - 3070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Liu, F. Reinhardt, A. Bunger, and R. Reents Derivation and Calculation of Approximate Reliabilities and Daughter Yield-Deviations of a Random Regression Test-Day Model for Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2004; 87(6): 1896 - 1907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Norberg, G. W. Rogers, R. C. Goodling, J. B. Cooper, and P. Madsen Genetic Parameters for Test-Day Electrical Conductivity of Milk for First-Lactation Cows from Random Regression Models J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2004; 87(6): 1917 - 1924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Odegard, J. Jensen, G. Klemetsdal, P. Madsen, and B. Heringstad Genetic Analysis of Somatic Cell Score in Norwegian Cattle Using Random Regression Test-Day Models J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2003; 86(12): 4103 - 4114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |